[sword-devel] Second versions, Scottish Metric Psalter
Peter von Kaehne
refdoc at gmx.net
Sun Jan 13 13:44:37 MST 2019
Ok, this is my interrim solution which I plan. I think it should work
I will create a double module - both confs in one file, second version
in the second (sub)module. Then I will create reference links from one
to the other at the header of each psalm with two versions. And back
again.
Peter
On Sun, 2019-01-13 at 12:51 -0700, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> A few thoughts...
> How do we envisage a frontend displaying this text? Do we expect
> each frontend to have special logic for displaying if there is a
> variation of the chapter? Consider all the various display cases:
> single Bible view, parallel Bible view, search results, etc... For
> example, if this module is included in a parallel display with a
> second module (say, Hebrew), what do we expect to happen if a chapter
> is displayed which includes an alternative chapter?
> I don't have any good ideas which avoid frontends including special
> logic for something like this, which isn't reasonable. We do have at
> least one other scenario which is similar: Rahlfs' LXX, which
> includes alternate traditions for books. We also struggled with the
> best way to capture and display this. More difficult, Ralhfs uses a
> differing versification for alternate book traditions. We did proof
> of concepts with adding Alt books to an LXX versification, allowing
> LXX Book versifications to have enough chapter, book max to cover
> either tradition, creating a single module, having 2 modules-- the
> second having only the alternate traditions. I don't recall where we
> left off on that or what strategy our current Rahlfs Bible uses. Our
> CATSS LXX GenBook includes book traditions as 'A' and 'B',
> http://crosswire.org/study/bookdisplay.jsp?mod=LXXM
> But that just punts on the problem and uses GenBook because doesn't
> need to solve the problem of relating 'A' and 'B' together somehow.
> Just some thoughts,
> Troy
>
> On 1/13/19 8:22 AM, David Haslam wrote:
> > The best solution may be to have two SMP modules each with 150
> > Psalms; one to have the V1s and the other to have the V2s for the
> > Psalms with 2 versions.
> >
> > NB. The canonical title should also be supplied for the Version 2.
> >
> > These Psalms could be given an extra technical note to explain
> > further.
> >
> > 138 Psalms would appear exactly the same in both modules, but the
> > convenience more than compensates for the duplications.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > David
> >
> > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 14:17, David Haslam <dfhdfh at protonmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > In response to DM, I think that's the wrong approach, as it would
> > > be confusing to mix two different metres for how the same Psalm
> > > was metrified in English.
> > > What's required is whole chapters as 2 different variants.
> > >
> > > There are 25 lines containing the word 'version':
> > > s2 First Version
> > > s2 Second Version
> > > s2 First Version (S.M.)
> > > s2 Second Version
> > > s2 First Version
> > > s2 Second Version
> > > s2 First Version
> > > s2 Second Version
> > > s2 First Version
> > > s2 Second Version
> > > s2 First Version
> > > s2 Second Version
> > > s2 First Version - this version was retained from the 1562
> > > English and 1564 Scottish Psalters. It is by William Kethe.
> > > s2 Second Version
> > > cl Psalm 102 There is also a Long Metre version below *
> > > s2 First Version
> > > s2 Second Version
> > > s2 First Version (8.7.8.7. Iambic)
> > > s2 Second Version (6.6.6.6.8.8.) This is a slightly modified
> > > version of the Psalm as it first appeared in the Scottish Psalter
> > > of 1564 *
> > > s2 First Version (C.M.)
> > > s2 Second Version (6.6.6.6.D.)
> > > s2 First Version
> > > s2 Second Version
> > > s2 First version
> > > s2 Second Version (6.6.6.6.8.8.)
> > >
> > > As you can see, one of these instances is simply within a note.
> > > So there are in fact 12 Psalms that have a second metrical
> > > version.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > >
> > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > On Saturday, 12 January 2019 13:55, refdoc at gmx.net <
> > > refdoc at gmx.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ah, yes, sorry
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my mobile. Please forgive shortness, typos and weird
> > > > autocorrects.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Second versions, Scottish Metric
> > > > Psalter
> > > > From: David Haslam
> > > > To: DM Smith
> > > > CC: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > NB. Peter's initial message contained a broken link to
> > > > > https://github.com/refdoc/The-Scottish-Metric-Psalter-1650
> > > > >
> > > > > The repo is now at
> > > > > https://gitlab.com/crosswire-bible-society/scottish-psalter-1650
> > > > >
> > > > > i.e. In our public facing location for PD text development.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > David
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > > > >
> > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > > > On Saturday, 12 January 2019 13:25, DM Smith <
> > > > > dmsmith at crosswire.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > If you make one module do it as variations verse by verse.
> > > > > > JSword works on this basis. Each needs to be well-formed
> > > > > > XML. Otherwise it will toss the markup.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do the canonical headings vary too? That might pose a
> > > > > > single module problem.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > David and I have discussed supporting multiple KJV modules
> > > > > > from a single xml doc using a filter (e.g. XSLT) to produce
> > > > > > subsets. Examples, with Apocrypha, without such, long s
> > > > > > variant, .....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I already have a couple of XSLT filters that others
> > > > > > requested: no notes or Strong’s numbers; Plaintext.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In Him,
> > > > > > DM Smith
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 12, 2019, at 7:38 AM, David Haslam <
> > > > > > dfhdfh at protonmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Sparsely populated....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 12:37, refdoc at gmx.net <
> > > > > > > refdoc at gmx.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Never looked at it. Why?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sent from my mobile. Please forgive shortness, typos
> > > > > > > > and weird autocorrects.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Second versions, Scottish
> > > > > > > > Metric Psalter
> > > > > > > > From: David Haslam
> > > > > > > > To: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> > > > > > > > CC:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You mean the Samaritan Pentateuch Dead Sea Scrolls
> > > > > > > > > variant module SPDSS isn't rather more of an overkill
> > > > > > > > > ?
> > > > > > > > > Have you ever looked at the contents?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I was about to suggest the same as Tom Sullivan did.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > A second module with just the alternative versions of
> > > > > > > > > these 11 or 12 Psalms,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But is there a third metrical version of any Psalm?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > David
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 10:30, Peter von Kaehne <
> > > > > > > > > refdoc at gmx.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2019-01-12 at 05:15 -0500, Tom Sullivan
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Peter:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Suggestion: Make 2 modules, one for each
> > > > > > > > > > translation. Most front
> > > > > > > > > > > ends
> > > > > > > > > > > will do parallel display.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For 11 or 12 (I need to count them) psalms that
> > > > > > > > > > seems overkill.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> > > > > > > > > > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at
> > > > > > > > > > above page
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> > > > > > > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> > > > > > > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above
> > > > > > > page
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
More information about the sword-devel
mailing list