[sword-devel] A new alternate versification?

[Matěj Cepl]

On 2018-11-23, 09:32 GMT, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> 1) If there is substantial need for a new v11n for - a single 
>  historical hugely important text
> 	- a group of texts following e.g. a particular translation 		
> tradition (Like SYnodalProt for IBT texts, NRSV for UBS 		and
> Wycliffe.

That would apply. I hope this av11n could apply to all 
Protestant Bibles keeping Apocrypha as separate books (not like 
Catholic Bibles, which incorporate deuterocanonical texts in 
particular books, if possible). I.e., the differentation factor 
is “Are there separate books called ‘Additions to Esther’ etc.”?

> "need" is vaguely defined as  more than ~ 100 verses out of 
> place or substantial other problems. 100 verses amount to 0.3% 
> are and unlikely to cause significant upset to any user. In 
> general I find that there are either only a few or many 
> hundreds out of line.

See the log on 
https://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/make-CzeB21-osis2mod-log.txt 
Is it enough wrong?

> Also, in order to help to find those reasons - can you link to 
> the OSIS file rather than your modue?

Not sure, what you mean. https://gitlab.com/mcepl/CzeB21 is pure 
OSIS XML, isn't it?

Blessings,

Matěj
-- 
https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mcepl at ceplovi.cz
GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5  BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8
 
Economics is the only discipline where two people can win a Nobel
Prize for saying exactly the opposite thing!
    -- Eamonn Butler of Adam Smith Institute
       on Nobel Prize awards for year 2001