[sword-devel] Fwd: Re: NASB status

Troy A. Griffitts scribe at crosswire.org
Tue Feb 21 16:43:56 MST 2017


Reposting the below message from the last time we visited this. If you 
wish to see the conversation around this, have a look at the mailman 
archives here:

http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/2016-January/thread.html



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [sword-devel] NASB status
Date: 	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:53:30 -0700
From: 	Troy A. Griffitts <scribe at crosswire.org>
Reply-To: 	SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum 
<sword-devel at crosswire.org>
To: 	SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum <sword-devel at crosswire.org>



I don't want to fight about this yet again.

This is a commercial module to be sold by Lockman.  That is a different
scenario from other modules.  For this module, I have reasonably asked:

1) That we have a scripted, reproducible way to transform their data
from their pristine source to a module.

2) That we support their entire dataset which they have given us for
this module (base text + footnotes / crossrefs + lexica)

3) That the result works generally in all major SWORD/JSword frontends.


It is not as simple as-- just release it and fix it later.  This is to
be sold by Lockman.

Historically, we have had at least 4 people own this effort over the
years.  It is not simply that one person has sat on this and hasn't
finished it for 12 years.

I think we are close.  In my mind, the current owner (Greg) simply needs
to have a list of outstanding items which keep us from satisfying 1-3
and push each of them down the road until they are done.

I don't know what those items are.  I am just concerned that we meet 1-3
before we give the data to Lockman to sell and I feel these 3 items are
reasonable requests.

Troy



On 01/06/2016 11:04 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> On 01/06/2016 10:56 AM, Greg Hellings wrote:
>> but no one has told me what those issues are
> It comes down to this:
> We need to look for the way to say Yes, and stop coughing up any and all
> possible, weak, ham-handed excuses to say No.
>
> A long time ago -- late '08 -- I flamed at length here about Getting
> Stuff Done.  The fact that NASB has languished for significantly longer
> than a decade and _/*STILL*/_ hasn't found its way out the door is an
> existential statement about Crosswire in this regard.  Crosswire as a
> whole has an indecent problem with the idea of Getting Stuff Done, where
> "done" means "out the door."
>
> If you consider this from the perspective of an outside observer, it
> looks like someone literally doesn't want NASB ever to be released.
> Consider: In the last 12 years, one of my sons graduated high school,
> took a couple years off, went to college, finished college, got married,
> began a career, and had his first child, who will be a year old very
> soon.  In that same time period Crosswire couldn't get the NASB module
> (set) finished.
>
> Any reason to say No is completely obliterated by saying "12 years."
> It's time to say Yes.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>

_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20170221/55843b7a/attachment.html>


More information about the sword-devel mailing list