[sword-devel] KJV update
Chris Little
chrislit at crosswire.org
Tue Feb 19 09:12:48 MST 2013
On 2/19/2013 6:43 AM, DM Smith wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Ben Morgan <benpmorgan at gmail.com
> <mailto:benpmorgan at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi DM,
>>
>> I'm looking at it for how it displays in BPBible. Mostly it seems to
>> show up fine.
>> At the moment the code I had in place actually shows the tr greek text
>> links, though it doesn't know what to look them up in (there's no
>> dictionary matching the tr: scheme, right?).
>
> There are a few other modules that have lemmas other than "strong:". If
> you want Strong's numbers look only for strong:.
>
>> I think I'll make it ignore them for now. It would be nice to have a
>> common way with non-strongs type lemmas to
>> 1) have them togglable with options (on a class by class basis? what
>> would you label this for tr: - TR? Greek?)
>
> The tr: lemma is the original greek from the TR Bible module. The src
> attribute gives the position of that word in the same verse.
>
> You can use the tr: value for an interlinear. You could also show the tr
> value and use the strong for the link.
A small note on the choice of lemma workIDs:
Our ad hoc standard way of identifying lemma types is to use a workID of
lemma.<source identifier>. The only module I can think of that employs
this is MorphGNT, which has lemma.Strong. You might use something like
lemma.TR, given the source. There's some special logic in the OSISLemma
filter for workIDs of this form, IIRC.
(Brief) documentation, to prove I'm not just making this up :), at:
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/OSIS_Bibles#Marking_other_lemmas
If you validate the OSIS with this, the validator will complain. Ignore
it. The bug is in the schema.
--Chris
More information about the sword-devel
mailing list