[sword-devel] KJV update

[DM Smith]

Yes. I thought my prior response was sufficient. The module has had them that way for 7 years. Front-ends have a variety of ways that they handle the pilcrow. I don't see the need for the change in the module.

If you take a look at the 1611, there is no space following the pilcrow:
http://sceti.library.upenn.edu/sceti/printedbooksNew/index.cfm?TextID=kjbible&PagePosition=77

I had noticed that the NT only used them until that location. Until you pointed out the reason, I had no clue as to why.

In Him,
	DM

On Feb 19, 2013, at 9:53 AM, David Haslam <dfhmch at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi DM,
> 
> Did you think further about
> http://crosswire.org/wiki/User:Dmsmith/KJV2011#Pilcrow_signs
> since my last response therein?
> 
> David
> 
> PS. A curious aside: After Acts 20:36 there are no more pilcrows in the KJV.
> /Specialist historians think the 1611 printers simply ran out of the movable
> type for this character./
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/KJV-update-tp4651977p4651983.html
> Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page