[sword-devel] CrossWire and git

[Troy A. Griffitts]

Guys who prefer GitLab, I am sorry. No university research project, no commercial job has ever asked me to use GitLab. They have all asked me use GitHub. From a purely popular choice and to prevent all of us from having to create yet another account (I am sure most everyone already has a GitHub account) and learn yet another tool, can't we just settle on GitHub. Would it make anyone extremely unhappy? GitLab is not my preferred choice.

On March 18, 2023 6:40:57 AM MST, Greg Hellings <greg.hellings at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 18, 2023, 06:41 Peter von Kaehne <refdoc at gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> GitLab vs GitLab
>>
>> [image: image3-1.png]
>>
>> GitLab vs GitHub: Top 10 Differences between GitHub and GitLab
>> <https://intellipaat.com/blog/gitlab-vs-github-difference/>
>> intellipaat.com
>> <https://intellipaat.com/blog/gitlab-vs-github-difference/>
>> <https://intellipaat.com/blog/gitlab-vs-github-difference/>
>>
>> There is plenty more but this gives a decent summary. GitLab allows
>> private repos which I think are a really useful thing. I think it should
>> also be easier to integrate our own GitLab stuff or move it if we want to
>>
>
>This comparison is quite dated (for instance, GitHub definitely has CI/CD
>integrated nowadays, and GitLab is by no means buggy and slow), but I also
>would support GitLab over GitHub as our definitive location simply on the
>principle of it being FOSS instead of closed source hosting.
>
>It does have an identical Code owners feature to GitHub with the same
>syntax and location. I'm not sure if it's available in the self hosted/free
>versions or if it is one of their premium features. I'm getting conflicting
>information on that.
>
>It does support automatic mirroring, so it would be easy for us to self
>host the official repository but still allow automated mirrors on GitHub
>and the public GitLab for ease of contribution by others.
>
>--Greg
>
>
>> We aren’t a democracy but as far as it goes - I welcome the move to Git
>> so, so gladly and I vote for moving towards GitLab as there is more active
>> development of us already
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> Sent from my phone. Please forgive misspellings and weird “corrections”
>>
>> On 18 Mar 2023, at 11:20, Matěj Cepl <mcepl at cepl.eu> wrote:
>>
>> On 2023-03-18, 09:55 GMT, Fr Cyrille wrote:
>>
>> I am very happy with this progress in your thinking about git. I just
>>
>> reiterate my preference for gitlab, where as Peter has already pointed
>>
>> out we now have all our modules. It would be consistent to add the sword
>>
>> sources there as well.
>>
>> @David I don't particularly use github for my personal projects which
>>
>> are all under gitlab.
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Matěj
>> --
>> https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, @mcepl at floss.social
>> GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5  BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8
>>
>> Pain is inevitable, but misery is optional. We cannot avoid pain,
>> but we can avoid joy.
>>    -- Tim Hansel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20230318/39c51c55/attachment.htm>