[sword-devel] The Digital Bible Library® ??? What do you think?

[Matěj Cepl]

On Sun, 24 May 2020 13:54:20 -0700 Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Maybe I am misunderstanding, but I think Matěj is suggesting 
> that the publisher of the CzeB21 is telling us that our next 
> module update of the CzeB21 should come from their text they 
> have uploaded to the DBL.

My real question was what do you know about this initiative, and 
whether we are not getting near the situation, where maintainers 
of Sword biblical modules should transfer their effort to DBL. 
Are there any plans to join effort under the DBL umbrella?

Not that I would be any eager to switch there, because just 
after we finally introduced true infrastructure for the modules 
maintenance on gitlab.com, I don’t see anything on the DBL site 
which would help me to maintain their modules.

> And Matěj is saying that he thinks their text in the DBL is 
> much worse than than what we are current using:

I am saying it about our module CzeBKR which is fixed comparing 
to what DBL (and eSword.org) have. I haven’t said anything about 
CzeB21, where the sources are from the publisher, and yes, we 
have some fixes on the top of that, but nothing significant 
(certainly, nothing of the magnitude of the incorrect version of 
New Testament as it was the case with CzeBKR).

Blessings,

Matěj

-- 
https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mcepl at ceplovi.cz
GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5  BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8
  
Love doesn't just sit there, like a stone; it has to be made,
like bread, remade all the time, made new.
   -- Ursula K. LeGuin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20200601/0a763c23/attachment.sig>