[sword-devel] Lucene search index and Coptic ?

[David Haslam]

Even if Troy's good friends don't use the Lucene index for their work on
Coptic manuscripts, that's no reason not to pursue this issue in more
detail.

The *Coptic* block *2C80..2CFF* was added with *Unicode 4.1* which was
released in March 2005.

Are we concluding that the Lucene indexing software built into SWORD is so
old that it doesn't support Unicode 4.1 ?

That's what it's beginning to look like to me.

Does it even support the *Tagalog* block *1700..170C, 170E..1714* (added
with Unicode 3.2 in March 2002) ?

Best regards,

David



--
View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Lucene-search-index-and-Coptic-tp4657103p4657110.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.