[sword-devel] Announcing Sword++
teusjannette at gmail.com
Mon Sep 26 10:34:44 MST 2016
Since a need was felt to create a fork - a fork that accesses the same vast
library of Bible texts and commentaries and supporting materials - it
becomes clear that this vast library is a valued asset, as perceived by the
creator of the fork. A fork could also have been created that starts
producing this large asset from scratch : But that didn't happen. So it
really shows how valuable this is, and I'd like to encourage all of you
working on all aspects of getting these religious texts to the people, that
is serves a purpose, to bring Christ more into focus: And this applies to
the maintainers of those texts, and the maintainers of the front-ends, and
the maintainers of SWORD(++).
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:25 Jaak Ristioja <jaak at ristioja.ee> wrote:
> On 26.09.2016 19:43, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> > Given that there is, just as Matej points out, likely only "market"
> space for one library , I think success of your fork will mean exactly this
> - regression and breakage for those parts you are not interested in. You
> have made this very clear.
> I also disagree with your market space theory regarding Sword/Sword++.
> And how on earth did you reach to such conclusions about regressions and
> breakage!? - I never said I will not support things I include in
> Sword++. I only said that bindings and some other stuff will not be
> included for the time being. Quite the contrary. And I'll keep pulling
> fixes from Sword as well.
> > But, I guess, you are not in a mood to listen to this.
> o_O You think? :D
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the sword-devel