[sword-devel] Coverity Scan

[jonathon]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 16/02/15 11:28, Matěj Cepl wrote:

> Usually the amount of false positives on the first run is quite 
> drastic, but the pain can subside with some amount of healing.

My impression is that for the first year or so,the ideal course of
action, is to simply rewrite code, as Coverty flags it for issues.
Once it passes all checks, then one has a "secure" base upon which to
add features, improvements, and additional test cases.

jonathon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=rmkW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----