[sword-devel] gcc 4.9.0

Greg Hellings greg.hellings at gmail.com
Fri May 16 15:10:20 MST 2014


I encountered the bug while I was working from Fedora's rawhide in an
attempt to build sword 1.7.3 with bindings for the next release of Fedora.
I filed the issue with the Fedora bugtracker and they suggested I file it
upstream. I have not yet copied that bug report to upstream.

I can verify that the exact same code builds fine with swig 2.0.11 in
Fedora 20 and gcc 4.8.?. But with you getting it on Windows with swig 3.0
and MSVC rules out the possibility that it's a gcc 4.8-4.9 issue. I'll copy
my bugzilla from redhat to the upstream tracker next chance I get. Until
that time, you can try building with swig 2.0.12, which is the latest
pre-3.0 release that I'm aware of. It's also entirely possible that there
is a swig devel repository somewhere that might already have this resolved
that we could check. It would probably be easier for me to check that on
Linux than for you to compile swig on Windows.

--Greg


On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:37 PM, R Johnson <
ps16thypresenceisfullnessofjoy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Interestingly, I just got that exact same error now when I tried to build
> Python bindings to Sword with VS2010, so this isn't just a GCC problem. I
> also got this same error when I tried to build Sword using the C# project
> file (and had mentioned it to you and Ben).
>
> As I said in my other thread, it makes no sense why that line (362) should
> cause an error when all of the functions called in it are used without any
> problem in the preceding lines. The only thing different I can see about it
> is that it uses the >> operator, so it seems to me like the error probably
> is a SWIG bug.
>
> (Maybe the C# project file was working better than we thought. But I still
> would prefer not to use it, since it's unmaintained and would likely need
> numerous hacks to work with Python. And CMake is more official and much
> nicer to use.)
>
> Have you been able to contact SWIG about this bug? If not, should I do so?
> Where do you think we should go from here?
>
> Thank you.
>
> -- Timothy
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20140516/6dfc5747/attachment.html>


More information about the sword-devel mailing list