[sword-devel] Sword packaging ....

[refdoc@gmx.net]

A lot has happened which should go into a stable release, so your bindings would nor be the only reason for a point release

Sent from my HTC

----- Reply message -----
From: "Daniel Hughes" <trampster at gmail.com>
To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" <sword-devel at crosswire.org>
Subject: [sword-devel] Sword packaging ....
Date: Sat, Apr 12, 2014 09:48


Obviously the biggest benefit to most people is 1.7.2 packages being
available. That should be the the first priority.

However once that is done I don't see any harm in development builds
being made available in a PPA for front end developer who want
something newer. It will also result in much better testing for the
development version of sword which can only be a win. People using an
unstable PPA will be well aware that they are using development
packages rather then the stable version.

Troy's suggestion of a a 1.7.3 release would also work well for me.
However I don't want to push sword into doing a stable release before
it is really ready.

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Troy A. Griffitts <scribe at crosswire.org> wrote:
> Daniel, I'm happy to move our flatapi work into a 1.7.3 release, along with
> any bug fixes we made along the way. I'm also happy to include your c#
> bindings. We've had 2 weeks of opportunity for comments on the interface.
> Without any objections over the next few days I'll commit them as is.
>
> On April 12, 2014 1:01:52 AM MST, Daniel Hughes <trampster at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm very interested in debian sword packages being made available in a
>> PPA.
>>
>> However I need packages built from the latest trunk. This is so that I
>> can make use of features in the flat API that where not present in
>> 1.7.2.
>>
>> Having an official development would allow me to publish dev builds of
>> my own front end to my users on ubuntu without having to wait years
>> for the next sword to be released and then finally included in the
>> official ubuntu repos.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Barry Drake <bdrake at crosswire.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi there ....  In collaboration with Roberto Sánchez, I've got a working
>>>  Debian package for Sword 1.7.2.  It needs fully inspecting and testing,
>>> but
>>>  it's close to being ready.  I've put the Debian and the original
>>> tarballs
>>>  at:
>>>  http://ubuntuone.com/4SZ059JHeoS4AlQ4gcr1Uf
>>>  http://ubuntuone.com/3gYDbANrO3mt5asihQ2OZ5
>>>
>>>  The orig.tar.gz tarball is identical in content to the tarball at:
>>>
>>> http://www.crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/source/v1.7/sword-1.7.2.tar.gz
>>>  and the Debian tarball contains the debian directory that goes into the
>>> top
>>>  level directory of the source.
>>>
>>>  Any problems, please let me know.
>>>
>>>  God bless,        Barry Drake.
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>>  sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>>>  http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>>>  Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20140412/3067206f/attachment-0001.html>