[sword-devel] Bibles without paragraphing
Nic Carter
niccarter at mac.com
Fri Nov 6 20:32:52 MST 2009
I really like the sound of this :)
One thought about your third strategy is that sometimes a paragraph
will start in the middle of a verse? Or, at least, I'm thinking that
some Psalms start a new line in the middle of a verse... I'm not sure
if we count a new-line in a Psalm as a new paragraph, but the
behaviour is similar?
Perhaps we could have both #1 and #3, where the user has a preference
to use #3 if the module lacks Feature=Paragraphs? And if not, could
then fall back to Verse-Per-Line?
If we had #1 over #2, it would save updating a LOT of module confs,
given that there's a much smaller number of modules with paragraphs
than without?
On a side note, if you're going to be going through module confs, how
possible is it to switch all confs to use UTF8? I know that there are
some confs that have their description written in different mark-
up . . . perhaps RTF? I'm not entirely sure what it is, but it would
be great if the front-end simply read in the conf description as UTF8
& knew that that would be valid text (whether that is Japanese,
Chinese, Spanish or Hebrew) & didn't require further massaging... :)
(as an example, the description text for ChiNCVt & ChiNCVs is a mess,
yet there are fun characters in VietLCCM & that one works fine?)
just my 2c,
nic... :)
On 07/11/2009, at 2:05 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> We have many many Bibles that lack any kind of paragraphing markup.
> These will tend to be rendered as a single big block of text per
> chapter, which is rather ugly.
>
> Some front ends offer a verse-per-line option where every verse gets
> its own newline, regardless of whether the Bible has paragraphing.
> I think this is a good option for the case of non-paragraphed Bibles
> but undesirable for those that do have paragraph indication.
>
> I would like to propose that we add a new Feature to .confs (e.g.
> Feature=Paragraphs). If the feature is absent, a front end can know
> that it should output newlines at the end of each verse.
>
> Alternately, we could tag unparagraphed Bibles with
> Feature=NoParagraphs. There will be many more Bibles that need to be
> checked, updated, and re-downloaded by users. But if a user fails to
> update his content, in this case there wouldn't be the incorrect
> behavior of rendering paragraphed Bibles as verse-per-line.
>
> A third alternative (probably less attractive now that we're
> releasing quite a few non-KJV v11n Bibles) is to do one of the above
> and then offer static paragraphing like OLB does. OLB starts new
> paragraphs at set verses, regardless of the Bible. We could grab the
> paragraph data from the KJV, for example, and then insert paragraph
> marks in the render filters.
>
>
> I think my preference is to add Feature=Paragraphs and just do verse-
> per-line in the absence of that feature. Thoughts?
>
> --Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
More information about the sword-devel
mailing list