[sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

[Chris Little]

Daniel Glassey wrote:
> Lynn Allan wrote:
> 
>>Troy wrote:
>>
>>
>>>PS.  I don't think we can add the VC6 project files to clutter our
>>>source directories.  If you can get them to follow the same theme as
>>
>>our
>>
>>
>>>other project files, then we can consider adding them; however,
>>
>>we're
>>
>>
>>>really close to a final release for 1.5.8-- but I would still like
>>
>>them
>>
>>
>>>added, even if they do not make this release. -T.
>>
>>
>>There are currently these subdirectories:
>>[sword-dir]/lib/bcppmake
>>[sword-dir]/lib/vcppmake/vc6
>>[sword-dir]/lib/vcppmake/vc7.1
>>[sword-dir]/tests/bcppmake
>>
>>When the "dust settles", would the following be appropriate for vc6
>>and/or vc7.1 projects for test source to contain .dsp
>>and/or .vcproj and/or .sln project files
>>
>>[sword-dir]/tests/vcppmake/vc6 (with .dsp)
>>[sword-dir]/tests/vcppmake/vc7.1 (with .vcproj + .sln)
>>[sword-dir]/examples/cmdline/vcppmake/vc6
>>[sword-dir]/examples/cmdline/vcppmake/vc7.1
>>[sword-dir]/utilities/vcppmake/vc6
>>[sword-dir]/utilities/vcppmake/vc7.1
> 
> 
> I think that sounds wrong. I think all the project files should go
> together. In fact, one project that allows you to build the tests,
> examples, utilites rather than just the lib. That would be consistent
> with gcc.

Agreed. We should do something parallel to the GCC & BCB projects. But 
to reiterate my position, I don't think this should be done right now, 
unless we plan to postpone the release of 1.5.8 for a week or so.

--Chris