[sword-devel] unresolved symbol after upgrade

Willem van Engen sword-devel@crosswire.org
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:12:42 +0100


Allright, I understand. And good to hear it's almost solved :)

Greetings,
- Willem

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:27:49 -0700
"Troy A. Griffitts" <scribe@crosswire.org> wrote:

> Willem,
> 	Officially 1.5.x is a development thread, but in practice, all
> 	the 
> frontends have moved from 1.4.x to 1.5.x.  This is my fault.  We
> should have a new stable thread started soon that will remain binary
> compatible with .x releases.
> 
> 	-Troy.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Willem van Engen wrote:
> > Hmm, too bad. Thanks for answering though :)
> > 
> > But ... is it very hard to keep binary compatibility (between major
> > versions - now and then api changes are really needed) ? If more
> > applications start using sword, it will get more annoying and
> > finally maybe unacceptable when upgrades break many programs (e.g.
> > webbrowser). Plugins might work around this, but still.
> > 
> > - Willem
> > 
> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:45:43 +0100
> > Joachim Ansorg <joachim@ansorgs.de> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>Yes, sadly you have recomple Gnomesword after you upgraded your
> >Sword>version because binary compatibity is not guaranteed for
> >between Sword>versions.
> >>
> >>Joachim
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hello,
> >>>
> >>>I upgraded sword from 1.5.3 to 1.5.5. Then I tried to run
> >>>gnomesword, dynamically with the 1.5.3 library. It fails with this
> >>>error:
> >>>
> >>>  /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol
> >>>  "_9LocaleMgr$systemLocaleMgr" referenced from COPY relocation in
> >>>  gnomesword
> >>>
> >>>(on a freebsd box). I remember unresolved symbols appearing at past
> >>>upgrades. Does it mean that I really have to recompile all
> >>>applications linked with sword, when it's upgraded? Or is there a
> >>>solution to this?
> >>>
> >>>Greetings,
> >>>- Willem
> >>>
> >>>btw. thanks for making sword compile with gcc3.2! I don't use gcc3
> >>>yet, but it's needed for freebsd-current which uses gcc3.2 by
> >>>default.
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>Joachim Ansorg
> >>www.bibletime.de
> >>www.ansorgs.de
> > 
> 
>