[sword-devel] undefined reference problems

[Daniel Glassey]

symlinks rather than copying are definitely the way to go and it's probably worth keeping 
both ways of building for now.
Um, I think I might have set up kmail wrong for my reply with the patch hasn't appeared 
here. It may have been sent from a different address and got stuck.

Daniel

On 12 Nov 2001 at 15:24, Troy A. Griffitts sent forth the message:

> 
> No, usually when doing a full build is when it happens-- not when
> developing.  The copying time isn't a problem, but instead rebuilding
> the entire archive each make.  This probably isn't much of an issue
> either, but just wanted to talk about it.
> 
> 	-Troy.
> 
> 
> 
> mg.pub@gmx.net wrote:
> > 
> > >       Maybe we could key off of the debug flag; if debug is true, we'll
> > > assume someone is developing and we should build the way it currently
> > > builds; but otherwise, we'll do your recommended method.  dunno.  what
> > > do you think?
> > 
> > Isn't it especially when you are developing that this problem occurs?
> > Do you really think the copying time would matter?
> > If so, creating symlinks (not possible on windows?) might be sufficient.
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > --
> > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
> > http://www.gmx.net



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com