[sword-devel] Copyrighted Texts Summary

[Brandon Staggs]

I respectfully ask that this discussion be brough to an end on this list. It
is clearly off-topic (far more so than the legal issues originally
discussed).

Not to mention that I am having a very difficult time not joining in, since
I disagree completely with your statements on this subject! :-)

-Brandon (A KJV-O kind of guy, or so called!)
http://staggs.pair.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Yeshiah Zalman <shayah@gatecom.com>
To: <sword-devel@crosswire.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Copyrighted Texts Summary


> >>> to bash anyone that read ANY translation other than King James
> and declare with full authority that these people were part of the Great
> Deception and essentially hellbound.
>
> I have had my fill of those arguments as well. In my case this guys
arguments were lunacy! and Laughable. But my point still stands.
> a translation is still a translaion. and EVERY translation has sever
doctrinal Errors. And people like these kjv only people
> exploint the flaws of the others (ie niv nasb) yet ignore those of the
kjv.
>
> Our Father in Heaven DOES guarrantee to protect His Word (psa 138.2 for
thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name.)
>
> but remember. HIS Word was not in english. Notice as I mention that in
3000 years. The Hebrew changes were practically nill and
> those that did occur, NEVER altered the meaning of the Text.   THE ame CAN
NOT be said with translations. Scripture is protected rom
> ABOVE. while translations are protected by copyright!
>
> THAT is the point we are dealing with...
> Before this thread strays to far and my cat grabs the ball!
>
> Not KJV-ONLY but BHS-only  hehehe
> sorry, I just love history and archaeology!
> And Truth
> Yeshiah