[osis-core] FW: [osis-user] USFM \nd --> TE 'Name Of God' <--OSIS

[Todd Tillinghast]

Chris,

I don't recall the discussion (nor dispute what you are saying).  

With this meaning then the type attribute would be wrong to add.

Todd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: osis-core-bounces at bibletechnologieswg.org [mailto:osis-core-
> bounces at bibletechnologieswg.org] On Behalf Of Chris Little
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 3:40 PM
> To: osis-core at bibletechnologieswg.org
> Cc: Jim_Albright at wycliffe.org
> Subject: Re: [osis-core] FW: [osis-user] USFM \nd --> TE 'Name Of God'
<--
> OSIS
> 
> I strongly object.  (We actually had this discussion at the meeting in
> Dallas just over a year ago.)
> 
> The only valid use of <divineName> is for translations of underlying
> Hebrew Yahweh, so this is implied and redundant.  Marking El, Elohim,
or
> Dagon with <divineName> would be equally incorrect usage.
<divineName>
> was added specifically and only for the tetragrammaton.
> 
> --Chris
> 
> On Thu, 27 May 2004, Todd Tillinghast wrote:
> 
> > I agree with Jim.
> >
> > We should add <divineName type="yhwh">.
> >
> > Any objections?
> >
> > Todd
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim_Albright at wycliffe.org [mailto:Jim_Albright at wycliffe.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 1:23 PM
> > To: osis-user at whi.wts.edu
> > Subject: RE: [osis-user] USFM \nd --> TE 'Name Of God' <--OSIS
> >
> > enumerated attributes requested
> >
> >
> > <osis:devineName @type='yhwh'> for Lord in the OT when the
underlying
> > text
> > is YHWH.
> >
> >
> > Jim Albright
> > 704 843-0582
> > Wycliffe Bible Translators
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> osis-core mailing list
> osis-core at bibletechnologieswg.org
> http://www.bibletechnologieswg.org/mailman/listinfo/osis-core