[osis-core] Is this ready for OSIS 1.1? Reference

[Patrick Durusau]

Todd,

Todd Tillinghast wrote:

> I am not sure I like the addation of xlink and xpointer to reference.
>
>  
>
Are you reading the same release I am? I said that xlink/xpointer would 
be added, not that they are part of the current spec.

I also noted, or meant to, that the currrent references can be used by a 
number of technologies and not just those two.

> I am not clear how we would expect people to use the rich behavior.
>
>  
>
> It is seems that there should be two different elements for theses two 
> different purposes.
>
>  
>
Different for XLink and XPointer? Not sure what you mean. (By way of 
explanation, I have always seen XPointer as an extension to XLink.)

> I suspect that there will be those who would suggest that my 
> perspective on references is merely a simple form of an xlink, but by 
> allowing the broader scoped element (which is a valuable tool) you 
> also loose the opportunity for a specific form and for valadation.
>
>  
>
> Todd
>
Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
pdurusau@emory.edu