[osis-core] Last changes! I Promise!

[Todd Tillinghast]

Can you explain what is meant TRW and TR?

If there are multiple nameing systems that could be put in the same
attribute in <w> then we need a way to indicate which naming system we mean.
If TR is intended as a "naming system" the we should adopt a convention to
separate the nameing system from the "name".  Something like "TR:12345"
would seem natural but ":" is not allowed in xs:ID.  What you think about
using "TR..12345" in the same form as "Bible.KJV..John.1.1".  This would
give us "strong..1234" for strongs numbers or "strong.extended..9934".

So I am proposing that we create a SimpleType that looks like

<xs:simpleType name="xyz">
	<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
		<xs:pattern value="(\w(\.[\w]+){0,}))\.\.(\w(\.[\w]+){0,}))"/>
	</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>

and use it for the attributes in <w> AND for target.

(I don't think that attributeExtension will work for POS, morph, and lemma.)

Todd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> [mailto:owner-osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org]On Behalf Of Scribe
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 3:00 AM
> To: osis-core
> Subject: Re: [osis-core] Last changes! I Promise!
>
>
> Thanks tons guys for the accomodations!  I have one more issue to
> clear up
> a little-- #2 below.
>
> Although a gloss sound kindof like what we are doing, it doesn't quite
> fit.  To boil down the example:
>
> TR:
> <w ID="TRW12345">en</w> <w ID="TRW12346">arXA</w>...
>
> KJV:
> <w sync="Bible.TR..John.1.1.TRW12345">In</w> <w
> sync="Bible.TR..John.1.1.TRW12346">the beginning</w>...
>
>
> This is for what I'm looking.  Something that lets me sync 2 translations
> together, for things like interlinear display, automatically generating
> english glosses for the TR, etc.  We discussed this type of syncing
> mechanism in Dallas, and I was under the impression that various
> attribute
> names during the lifetime of the OSIS incarnation process were for this.
> I'm happy with target, sync, or whatever.  Also happy with freeform
> sync="TRW12345", rather than a validating reference.  Doesn't matter to
> me, but would like some mechanism to achieve this.
>
> Thanks again for your consideration.
>
> 	-Troy.
>
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Patrick Durusau wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > 1. On the issue of translation names, Steve and I found while on the
> > phone a fairly good listing at:
> > http://geocities.com/bible_translation/english.htm. And, Chris has sent
> > in some more. I will be adding those, probably early in the morning.
> >
> > 2. Target references: Steve suggests that listing Strongs number for
> > lemma, POS (part of speech), etc., is perfectly acceptable. I
> guess I am
> > more accustomed to seeing an actual value there and not a reference to
> > something else. So, gloss, which is what you are doing, glossing the
> > translated word with the original, is the place to put the synch. (In
> > other words, no need to modify the schema.)
> >
> > 3. Content model question: phrase level markup inside <div>
> with no <p>.
> > Granted. Will be in the final release in the morning. A real gain for
> > people who do not follow a paragraph markup and no real loss for people
> > who do. Will be suggested that encoders pick one or the other.
> >
> > Would try to send out the mods now but have been up since around 4 AM
> > and would make too many stupid errors.
> >
> > This should settle all the issues that I am aware of!
> >
> > Hope this finds one and all in good health and spirits!
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> >
>
>