[jsword-devel] Java 1.6
Douglas Campos
qmx at qmx.me
Sun Sep 2 21:59:19 MST 2012
Another advantage on going with 1.6 as minimum is the opportunity to use Stax/XML streaming APIs and get rid of JDOM (heinous dependency graph + slow)
On Aug 27, 2012, at 6:32 AM, Martin Denham wrote:
> Java support for Android is a bit confusing because Android Java (Dalvik) is based on Apache Harmony which conforms to almost all of Java 6. However Dalvik uses its own class library built on a subset of Harmony which does not align to standard profiles (for example Swing is not supported).
>
> Android System Requirements (click link below Download button) specify that Android requires JDK 6, so if JSword builds with JDK 6 it should be okay for Android.
>
> Regards
> Martin
>
> On 25 August 2012 21:43, Chris Burrell <chris at burrell.me.uk> wrote:
> The one I was thinking of at the time would be the @Override annotation. It makes it clearer from the code that you are indeed implementing an interface in Java 6. Java 5 doesn't actually allow you to specify the annotation. So it's not a biggy, just very handy when you do massive refactors and you want to check you're implementing an interface and not just declaring another stand-alone method.
>
> http://javamoods.blogspot.co.uk/2010/02/override-changes-in-java-6.html for more details.
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 25 August 2012 21:35, DM Smith <dmsmith at crosswire.org> wrote:
> A few:
> We want to support at least the last five years of popular operating systems (Windows, Mac, Linux, BSD, Android).
> Mac OS X of older vintages don't have Java 6.
> Java 7 is just out for the most recent Macs running the most recent OS. I've tested it and found no problems.
> The Android market is quite fragmented. I don't have a good handle on what level of features their Java supports.
>
> We want to support older hardware. This is true in missionary circles with hand-me-down machines. And I still have an actively used older, perfectly good Mac that cannot run Java 6.
>
> The libraries that we depend upon are at Java 5.
>
> The last release was Java 1.4. I think it'd be good for the next release to be Java 5.
>
> Regarding Java 6 and 7:
>
> JSword runs just fine with a Java 6 jre.
>
> I've also compiled JSword with Java 6 jdk and it compiles and runs just fine w/ Java 5 JREs. Perhaps a bit faster.
> I haven't tested Java 7 yet, but I expect the same.
>
> Are there any features of Java 6 or 7 that you feel would make JSword better?
>
> In Him,
> DM
>
> On Aug 25, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Chris Burrell <chris at burrell.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > Any reason to stick with Java 1.5? We could upgrade to 1.6 or even Java 7...
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jsword-devel mailing list
> > jsword-devel at crosswire.org
> > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jsword-devel mailing list
> jsword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jsword-devel mailing list
> jsword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel
-- qmx
More information about the jsword-devel
mailing list