[jsword-devel] XSLT and enrichment of OSIS Text...
Chris Burrell
chris at burrell.me.uk
Sat Nov 6 13:53:22 MST 2010
Another question too. It seems sometimes, both in bible desktop and my
current application, the html rendered is broken?
Any ideas why that might be?
For example, I get:
"<div class="passageText ui-widget"><div><h2 class="heading">Acts
2:10</h2><span class="verse"><span class="w"><sup
class="verseNumber">10</sup></span><span class="w"*><span
class="text">emma="strong:G1909" morph="robinson:PREP*" src="4">upon
every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the
Gentile;</span></span></span> </div></div>"
The above in bold shows that it didn't get XSLTed properly.
Instead of "<div class="passageText ui-widget"><div><h2 class="heading">Acts
2:10</h2><span class="verse"><sup class="verseNumber">10</sup><span
class="w"><span class="text"> </span> </span><span class="w"><span
class="text"> </span> </span><span class="w"><span
class="text">Phrygia</span></span>, <span class="w"><span
class="text"> </span> </span><span class="w"><span
class="text">and</span></span> <span class="w"><span
class="text">Pamphylia</span></span>, <span class="w"><span class="text">in
Egypt</span></span>, <span class="w"><span class="text">and</span></span>
<span class="w"><span class="text">in the parts</span></span> <span
class="w"><span class="text">of Libya</span></span> <span class="w"><span
class="text">about</span></span> <span class="w"><span
class="text">Cyrene</span></span>, <span class="w"><span
class="text">and</span></span> <span class="w"><span
class="text">strangers</span></span> <span class="w"><span class="text">of
Rome</span></span>, <span class="w"><span class="text">Jews</span></span>
<span class="w"><span class="text"> </span> </span><span
class="w"><span class="text">and</span></span> <span class="w"><span
class="text">proselytes</span></span>,</span> </div></div>"
So somehow it lost a whole load on the way out of the XSLT? The only
difference is that the first one is on startup of the server, the second is
with a refresh in the browser. Perhaps something hasn't loaded up
correctly/entirely?
Chris
On 5 November 2010 23:10, Chris Burrell <chris at burrell.me.uk> wrote:
> Thanks DM. So I found this page (again)!
> http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/interlinear/
>
> <http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/interlinear/>And managed to replicate
> (and solve?) the issues I found originally when I looked at it before:
>
> 1st When lines in the interlinear only have 1 line (i.e. no 2nd/3rd or 4th
> line). As a result, when the text wraps, it floats below the first line. As
> a hack (although on could argue that there is an empty spot there, rather
> than nothing), I think we can put a <span> </span> or we could use a
> height maybe? (not quite so good, unless we specify in ems and exs). And the
> second thing is that within a particular word stack, the words might wrap. I
> believe this particular issue is only visible in IE. For IE 8, the fix is to
> put a whitespace: nowrap CSS directive. Not sure if that helps on IE6 and 7
> though? Spec says it should be supported on both browsers.
>
> And yup, I'm targetting web environments, and also web mobile browsers.
> Chris
>
>
> On 5 November 2010 20:09, DM Smith <dmsmith at crosswire.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm heading out for the weekend. In a few minutes.
>> It'll probably be Monday evening when I send it.
>>
>> The solution uses spans with their display set to block.
>>
>> -- DM
>>
>>
>> On 11/05/2010 03:55 PM, Chris Burrell wrote:
>>
>> DM, you said you might have an intearlinear model that worked? I had
>> another look to see how I did mine previously, and found that in fact I used
>> tables. I think I struggled for quite a while to get a model working across
>> browsers using DIVs, but none of them seemed to wrap properly at the end of
>> the line. But unfortunately table layouts are slow and therefore it would
>> be better to have divs.
>>
>> Would you be able to let me have your samples?
>> Chris
>>
>> On 5 November 2010 19:21, Chris Burrell <chris at burrell.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> What's GNT? Greek New Testament? I think we can do more than that too. If
>>> other Bible versions have strong numbers and/or morphology tags, then we can
>>> put those in parallel, and end up having French with English "subtitles", or
>>> English with English, as well as English with Greek, etc.
>>>
>>> So I've had a look at the framework so far and it seems fairly easy not
>>> to use Bible Desktop components and have a good XSLT transformation. So all
>>> we would need to add is some helpers that users can easily integrate into
>>> their XSLTs. It would nice to have some sample XSLs for people to use. So
>>> for example, I've had to strip out all the CSS and font tags from the Bible
>>> Desktop one so as to produce a good XHTML compliant one.
>>>
>>> Say we give the XSLT a InterlinearProvider initialised with its version
>>> and passage, as it parses the strong/morph option we can then call
>>> get($provider, @strong, @morph), which would in turn optionally return the
>>> correct words (or best word since sometimes you may have multiple options in
>>> modules tagged with strong numbers only. In fact it would be better to have
>>> something like get($provider, osis_verse_id, @strong, @morph). Since then,
>>> if we don't have the morphology of the word, at least we can limit the
>>> lookups to those words that are tagged in a particular verse (that assumes
>>> that versification is comparable between versions).
>>>
>>> We'll want to add options to have tagged information displayed on the
>>> side of a word/phrase or below a word/phrase. At the moment the XSLT
>>> displays morph and strong tags next to the text. I'll add some
>>> transformations to have it on separate lines. Then we can reuse the same
>>> transformations to line up text beneath it.
>>>
>>> DM, I had a look at "flying saucer" , but didn't quite understand where
>>> it comes in? Would the idea be instead of the XSLT? And have it transform to
>>> different UIs?
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 November 2010 03:51, Tonny Kohar <tonny.kohar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:30 PM, DM Smith <dmsmith at crosswire.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Much of the transformations is done in BibleDesktop. Refactoring these
>>>> and
>>>> > putting it into JSword and/or common would be good.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> Yes it would be nice to have this under JSword instead of BIbleDesktop
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely
>>>> Tonny Kohar
>>>> --
>>>> Alkitab Bible Study
>>>> http://www.kiyut.com/products/alkitab/index.html
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jsword-devel mailing list
>>>> jsword-devel at crosswire.org
>>>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jsword-devel mailing listjsword-devel at crosswire.orghttp://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jsword-devel mailing list
>> jsword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/jsword-devel/attachments/20101106/2661364f/attachment.html>
More information about the jsword-devel
mailing list