[jsword-devel] RE: TWiki - Registration for CameronBraid

[Joe Walker]

Hi,

I realised today that whilst what I wrote is (mostly) true it doesn't 
answer all the questions.

I've upgraded to JAXB1.0 which should hit CVS soon, and more importantly 
fixed the bugs that made the ant build script loose the jaxb jars. I've 
also fixed the static factory method problem you noticed.

It looks from the the bibletechnologies.org site as though 1.1.1 is the 
most up to date OSIS and not 1.2 as previously thought.

Hope this helps.

Joe.

Joe Walker wrote:
>>
>>
>> Cameron Braid wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> I have been trying to setup the Jsword project in Eclipse to be able to
>>> compile the project.
>>>
>>> Firstly, there isn't any documentation to indicate that JAXB us 
>>> needed to
>>> build the project.  I figured this out from reading the ant build 
>>> script.
>>> It may be worthwhile adding this info to the twiki (which I can do as 
>>> soon
>>> as my registration is approved)
>>>   
> 
> 
> JSword comes with JAXB, so you shouldn't need to download anything new. 
> However there is one trick documented at the top of the build.xml where 
> you need to run ANT to use JAXB to generate the classes from the OSIS 
> schema before eclipse will compile everything. Maybe this was the problem?
> 
>>> I have run into a problem with the Osis binding, using JAXB. 
>>> I downloaded the latest version of the Java Web Services Developer 
>>> Pack 1.1
>>> - jwsdp-1.1
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell, this is the only downloadable version.
>>>
>>> I installed this pack, and setup my classpath to contain the JAXB jars.
>>>
>>> I then ran the ant script to compile the schema binding classes.
>>>
>>> The problem is with the ObjectFactory - All methods of this class are 
>>> used
>>> in a static context, even though they are not static.
>>>
>>> I presume that the osis code has been written against an older 
>>> version of
>>> JAXB.
>>>   
> 
> 
> Yup. JAXB 0.9 is included, and you're right I do need to upgrade.
> I'll shout when it is done. While I'm at it I think there is a new 
> version of OSIS out. I'm on 1.1, but I think there is a 1.2
> 
>>> Will this code be upgraded to use the latest version fo JAXB, or can you
>>> include a 'generated' source tree in the CVS repository so that I 
>>> don't need
>>> the old JAXP version?
>>>   
> 
> 
> What does everyone think about including generated source in CVS? I'm 
> fairly against it because the ant script should check all the 
> dependancies and do all the work for you, so the only barrier should be 
> understanding.
> In addition adding the stuff to CVS makes for even bigger source trees, 
> (source .zips are 8Mb already!) and it makes it possible for things to 
> get out of sync, both in CVS and in peoples personal trees, and it slows 
> CVS check-in/outs.
> 
> I'm going to be updating the website soon so I'll add some stuff on this.
> 
> Joe.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jsword-devel mailing list
> jsword-devel@crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel