[bt-devel] Problem with Indexing in BT 2.8.1

[Greg Hellings]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:43 AM, troypulk <troypulk at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Okay,
>
> This is what I have.
>
> Using r2400/r2671 osis2mod to compile my EMTV
>
> 1) r2671 - 1.6.2/SVN-2675 - 2.8.4 = does not work
> 2) r2671 - 1.6.2/SVN-2675 - 2.9.1 = does not work
> 3) r2671 - 1.6.0/PCLinuxOS-version - 2.8.4 = r2671 does not work with 1.6.0
> 4) r2671 - 1.6.0/PCLinuxOS-version - 2.9.1 = r2671 does not work with 1.6.0

For these two just use the module that was created with r2671 and try
reading it with 1.6.0 - 2.{8.4/9.1} and let us know how that goes.
That should be the deciding factor that tells us what the culprit is.

--Greg

> 5) r2400 - 1.6.0/PCLinuxOS-version - 2.8.4 = works
> 6) r2400 - 1.6.0/PCLinuxOS-version - 2.9.1 = works
> 7) r2400 - 1.6.2/SVN-2675 - 2.8.4 = does not work
> 8) r2400 - 1.6.2/SVN-2675 - 2.9.1 = does not work
>
> On #3 and 4 r2671 said it was looking for 1.6.2 since it was not installed it did not work.
>
> I do not have Xiphos installed, trying to install fails so I gave up on it.
>
> In using mkfastmod:
>
> 1) r2671 - 1.6.2 = works
> 2) r2671 - 1.6.0 = PClinuxOS does not have mkfastmod
> 3) r2400 - 1.6.2 = works
> 4) r2400 - 1.6.0 = PClinuxOS does not have mkfastmod
>
> Thanks
>
> Troy
>
>
> --- On Thu, 1/19/12, Greg Hellings <greg.hellings at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Greg Hellings <greg.hellings at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [bt-devel] Problem with Indexing in BT 2.8.1
>> To: "BibleTime development" <bt-devel at crosswire.org>
>> Date: Thursday, January 19, 2012, 11:59 AM
>> You should ALWAYS use the latest
>> version of osis2mod from SVN and
>> never the version that came out with a SWORD release, unless
>> you're
>> dealing with archaic SWORD libraries that you for some
>> strange reason
>> need to have compatibility with. That said...
>>
>> There seem to be too many moving parts here to determine
>> which exactly
>> is the culprit. Use these combinations and to test:
>>
>> 1) r2671 - 1.6.2 - 2.8.4
>> 2) r2671 - 1.6.2 - 2.9.1
>> 3) r2671 - 1.6.0 - 2.8.4
>> 4) r2671 - 1.6.0 - 2.9.1
>> 5) r2400 - 1.6.0 - 2.8.4
>> 6) r2400 - 1.6.0 - 2.9.1
>> 7) r2400 - 1.6.2 - 2.8.4
>> 8) r2400 - 1.6.2 - 2.9.1
>>
>> Start at the top of the list and move down. I have ordered
>> them the
>> way I did so as to hopefully produce the smallest set of
>> tests that
>> you need to do in order to determine the culprit. BibleTime
>> does not
>> use SWORD's indexing but instead uses its own. Use the
>> following
>> criteria realizing that the exact inverse of working/not
>> working is
>> equivalent to what I'm saying here as well
>>
>> a) If the module works with 1 but not with 2 (or with 2 but
>> not 1),
>> then problem is in BibleTime's code and you can stop.
>> b) If the module works with 1 and 2 but not with 3 and 4
>> (ditto the
>> reverse), then the problem is in the SWORD library or the
>> SWORD-BibleTime bridge and you can stop.
>> b.5) If it works with 1-4 but not 5-8 (same with the
>> reverse) then the
>> problem is with osis2mod
>> c) Only if neither of those setups gives the proper answer
>> should you
>> move on and test 5-8. In that case, send back the full
>> results of your
>> testing so we can tease out the proper conclusion.
>>
>> You might also try these four combos as well, while you're
>> doing the testing
>> 1) r2671 - 1.6.2
>> 2) r2671 - 1.6.0
>> 3) r2400 - 1.6.2
>> 4) r2400 - 1.6.0
>>
>> For these tests either use Xiphos to create the index or use
>> the
>> command line tool "mkfastmod" to do the indexing. This would
>> help us
>> figure out if the problem is in SWORD or BibleTime (or even
>> the module
>> itself).
>>
>> --Greg
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:24 PM, troypulk <troypulk at yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> > The latest info on this is that BT 2.8.4 with Sword
>> 1.6.0 indexes just fine.
>> >
>> > But as I go up the ladder to the latest Sword SVN and
>> BT 2.9.0 and up the indexing fails for my recompiled EMTV
>> module.
>> >
>> > Even the updated EMTV from Sword does not Index, it was
>> compiled with osis2mod 2671
>> >
>> > The osis2mod I'm using for BT 2.8.4 with Sword 1.6.0 is
>> 2400
>> >
>> > The osis2mod I'm using for BT 2.9.1 with Sword SVN is
>> 2671
>> >
>> > I've been working around this by using BT 2.8.4 with
>> Sword 1.6.0 to index the EMTV then running BT 2.9.1 to use
>> it.
>> >
>> > I think that osis2mod is the issue?
>> >
>> > Install the updated EMTV and see if it works for you?
>> >
>> > Troy
>> >
>> > I'm using PCLinuxOS 2011 Xfce 64bit
>> > BT - 2.9.1
>> > sword - latest SVN
>> > clucene - 0-0.9.21b-1
>> > qt - 4.7.3
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>Troy,
>> >>
>> >>I was able to index these files and get search
>> results for them. I am
>> >>guessing that this relates to a difference in the
>> libraries that BT is
>> >>using, perhaps clucene. All my libraries are ubuntu
>> standard packages.
>> >>
>> >>Kubuntu 11.04
>> >>Bibletime - latest git code
>> >>clucene - 0.921b-2
>> >>sword - 1.6.1+dfsg-2build1
>> >>qt 0- 4.7.2
>> >>
>> >>bibletime-index.conf - same as yours
>> >>_6d7.cfs 727054 bytes
>> >>deletable 4 bytes
>> >>segments 29 bytes
>> >>
>> >>I am not sure where to go next.
>> >>
>> >>Gary
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > bt-devel mailing list
>> > bt-devel at crosswire.org
>> > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bt-devel mailing list
>> bt-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bt-devel mailing list
> bt-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel