[bt-devel] Problem with Indexing in BT 2.8.1

[troypulk]

Okay,

This is what I have.

Using r2400/r2671 osis2mod to compile my EMTV 

1) r2671 - 1.6.2/SVN-2675 - 2.8.4 = does not work
2) r2671 - 1.6.2/SVN-2675 - 2.9.1 = does not work
3) r2671 - 1.6.0/PCLinuxOS-version - 2.8.4 = r2671 does not work with 1.6.0
4) r2671 - 1.6.0/PCLinuxOS-version - 2.9.1 = r2671 does not work with 1.6.0
5) r2400 - 1.6.0/PCLinuxOS-version - 2.8.4 = works
6) r2400 - 1.6.0/PCLinuxOS-version - 2.9.1 = works
7) r2400 - 1.6.2/SVN-2675 - 2.8.4 = does not work
8) r2400 - 1.6.2/SVN-2675 - 2.9.1 = does not work

On #3 and 4 r2671 said it was looking for 1.6.2 since it was not installed it did not work.

I do not have Xiphos installed, trying to install fails so I gave up on it.

In using mkfastmod:

1) r2671 - 1.6.2 = works
2) r2671 - 1.6.0 = PClinuxOS does not have mkfastmod
3) r2400 - 1.6.2 = works
4) r2400 - 1.6.0 = PClinuxOS does not have mkfastmod

Thanks

Troy


--- On Thu, 1/19/12, Greg Hellings <greg.hellings at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Greg Hellings <greg.hellings at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [bt-devel] Problem with Indexing in BT 2.8.1
> To: "BibleTime development" <bt-devel at crosswire.org>
> Date: Thursday, January 19, 2012, 11:59 AM
> You should ALWAYS use the latest
> version of osis2mod from SVN and
> never the version that came out with a SWORD release, unless
> you're
> dealing with archaic SWORD libraries that you for some
> strange reason
> need to have compatibility with. That said...
> 
> There seem to be too many moving parts here to determine
> which exactly
> is the culprit. Use these combinations and to test:
> 
> 1) r2671 - 1.6.2 - 2.8.4
> 2) r2671 - 1.6.2 - 2.9.1
> 3) r2671 - 1.6.0 - 2.8.4
> 4) r2671 - 1.6.0 - 2.9.1
> 5) r2400 - 1.6.0 - 2.8.4
> 6) r2400 - 1.6.0 - 2.9.1
> 7) r2400 - 1.6.2 - 2.8.4
> 8) r2400 - 1.6.2 - 2.9.1
> 
> Start at the top of the list and move down. I have ordered
> them the
> way I did so as to hopefully produce the smallest set of
> tests that
> you need to do in order to determine the culprit. BibleTime
> does not
> use SWORD's indexing but instead uses its own. Use the
> following
> criteria realizing that the exact inverse of working/not
> working is
> equivalent to what I'm saying here as well
> 
> a) If the module works with 1 but not with 2 (or with 2 but
> not 1),
> then problem is in BibleTime's code and you can stop.
> b) If the module works with 1 and 2 but not with 3 and 4
> (ditto the
> reverse), then the problem is in the SWORD library or the
> SWORD-BibleTime bridge and you can stop.
> b.5) If it works with 1-4 but not 5-8 (same with the
> reverse) then the
> problem is with osis2mod
> c) Only if neither of those setups gives the proper answer
> should you
> move on and test 5-8. In that case, send back the full
> results of your
> testing so we can tease out the proper conclusion.
> 
> You might also try these four combos as well, while you're
> doing the testing
> 1) r2671 - 1.6.2
> 2) r2671 - 1.6.0
> 3) r2400 - 1.6.2
> 4) r2400 - 1.6.0
> 
> For these tests either use Xiphos to create the index or use
> the
> command line tool "mkfastmod" to do the indexing. This would
> help us
> figure out if the problem is in SWORD or BibleTime (or even
> the module
> itself).
> 
> --Greg
> 
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:24 PM, troypulk <troypulk at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > The latest info on this is that BT 2.8.4 with Sword
> 1.6.0 indexes just fine.
> >
> > But as I go up the ladder to the latest Sword SVN and
> BT 2.9.0 and up the indexing fails for my recompiled EMTV
> module.
> >
> > Even the updated EMTV from Sword does not Index, it was
> compiled with osis2mod 2671
> >
> > The osis2mod I'm using for BT 2.8.4 with Sword 1.6.0 is
> 2400
> >
> > The osis2mod I'm using for BT 2.9.1 with Sword SVN is
> 2671
> >
> > I've been working around this by using BT 2.8.4 with
> Sword 1.6.0 to index the EMTV then running BT 2.9.1 to use
> it.
> >
> > I think that osis2mod is the issue?
> >
> > Install the updated EMTV and see if it works for you?
> >
> > Troy
> >
> > I'm using PCLinuxOS 2011 Xfce 64bit
> > BT - 2.9.1
> > sword - latest SVN
> > clucene - 0-0.9.21b-1
> > qt - 4.7.3
> >
> >
> >
> >>Troy,
> >>
> >>I was able to index these files and get search
> results for them. I am
> >>guessing that this relates to a difference in the
> libraries that BT is
> >>using, perhaps clucene. All my libraries are ubuntu
> standard packages.
> >>
> >>Kubuntu 11.04
> >>Bibletime - latest git code
> >>clucene - 0.921b-2
> >>sword - 1.6.1+dfsg-2build1
> >>qt 0- 4.7.2
> >>
> >>bibletime-index.conf - same as yours
> >>_6d7.cfs 727054 bytes
> >>deletable 4 bytes
> >>segments 29 bytes
> >>
> >>I am not sure where to go next.
> >>
> >>Gary
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bt-devel mailing list
> > bt-devel at crosswire.org
> > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bt-devel mailing list
> bt-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
>