<div dir="ltr"><div>Dom,</div><div><br></div><div>I'm looking through xc-xiphos-win.sh and I'm curious:</div><div><br></div><div>Can we retool this so that it's just a regular shell script that can be passed to Docker/podman/etc and it does the installing of deps and builds internal to itself? Then we can easily invoke it like</div><div><br></div><div>(docker|podman) run -i -t -v /path/to/xiphos/source:/xiphos fedora:30 /xiphos/win32/xc-xiphos-win.sh -win32</div><div><br></div><div>This would make things very much easier for automating builds and allowing people to test it locally. I don't use toolbox, but I do use Docker regularly on Fedora 31. And most all of our cloud providers come with Docker available out of the box, but either don't offer toolbox or it's going to be a royal pain to get it working on their infra. I'm happy to undertake this effort, and add it to the CI, if you don't mind.<br></div><div><br></div><div>--Greg<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:26 PM Greg Hellings <<a href="mailto:greg.hellings@gmail.com">greg.hellings@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Maybe try skipping toolbox and going straight to Podman to test if it can do things directly?<br></div><div><br></div><div>podman run -i -t fedora-toolbox:30 /bin/bash</div><div><br></div><div>--Greg<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:01 PM Karl Kleinpaste <<a href="mailto:karl@kleinpaste.org" target="_blank">karl@kleinpaste.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>On 4/24/20 11:59 AM, Dominique Corbex
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Have you disabled SELinux enabled or running Permissive mode?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<font face="FreeSerif">Oh, is that it?<br>
<br>
I've run with SELinux disabled since Fedora Core 3, when every
update to selinux-policy-targeted threatened to brick my machine.
selinux=0 is in my boot flags.<br>
<br>
I consider it a detailed practical implementation of a theoretical
device with little practical value for me, a solution in search of
a problem I don't have. But I don't doubt that others will have
explanations for its worth. I get better security protection by
moving sshd to a nonstandard port.<br>
</font><br>
<tt>> If you create a default toolbox:</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>> $ toolbox create</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>> $ toolbox enter</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>> Are you facing the same issue?</tt><br>
<pre><font face="FreeSerif">Yes.</font>
</pre>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
xiphos-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:xiphos-devel@crosswire.org" target="_blank">xiphos-devel@crosswire.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/xiphos-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/xiphos-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>