<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 27/07/2022 à 16:52, Matěj Cepl a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:slrnte2ka4.m63.mcepl@stitny.cepl.eu">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On 2022-07-27, 14:28 GMT, David Haslam wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">engoebcweb
engoebuseb
We probably don’t need to also host the OEB in the CrossWire repo.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
??? But we have OEB in the Sword:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.crosswire.org/sword/modules/ModInfo.jsp?modName=OEB">https://www.crosswire.org/sword/modules/ModInfo.jsp?modName=OEB</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.crosswire.org/sword/modules/ModInfo.jsp?modName=OEBcth">https://www.crosswire.org/sword/modules/ModInfo.jsp?modName=OEBcth</a>
So, either we should remove it from our repositories or update
it, because it shamefully old (considering continuously
developing nature of OEB).
And there are some people amongst us, who don’t held Ebible.org
repositories in too high regard, because we suspect that they are
playing rather fast and loose with copyright laws. So, I usually
don’t use their Bibles at all, if I don’t have to (and so far, I
don’t).
</pre>
</blockquote>
We have many duplicate modules. Personally I also find it
counterproductive, and if I had my way I would remove everything
present on ebible from Crosswire, as we know the copyright of those
are sure. The first reason is that ebible modules are extremely well
maintained.<br>
So I'm in favor of removing those modules.<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:slrnte2ka4.m63.mcepl@stitny.cepl.eu">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
Best,
Matěj
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div id="grammalecte_menu_main_button_shadow_host" style="width:
0px; height: 0px;"></div>
</body>
</html>