<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>That looks nice, Tobias. Thanks to everyone who commented on this. I think we do similar normalization in the engine for the lookup, but not in the search. You'd know if the NASB on the the live swordweb site allows a word click at one of these locations with a letter suffix and it still produces a result. I'm on my phone right now and can't easily try. Great work everyone!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On July 18, 2020 10:00:46 AM GMT+02:00, Tobias Klein <contact@tklein.info> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/16/20 4:02 AM, Karl Kleinpaste
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:0b3a4e4f-0712-f172-1cad-90a981c12b19@kleinpaste.org">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/15/20 5:08 PM, Tobias Klein
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:ff72a1ea-7494-551f-6e30-ccd30e52f359@tklein.info"><font face="FreeSerif">Is there any other translation out there that
uses these special Strong's keys?</font></blockquote>
<br>
<font face="FreeSerif">I don't think any other uses the NAS
lexicons. However, those are not the only "not-Strong's
Strong's". For example, there is the Berean Bible (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://berean.bible" moz-do-not-send="true">http://berean.bible</a>) who have
produced their own content of this sort. I am (over)due to
re-work my existing BIBdraft, BSBdraft, and lexicon modules with
the full, finalized content. This sort of thing is going to
induce me to make per-module Strong's dictionaries possible in
Xiphos.</font></blockquote>
<p><br>
Thanks once more! I've found a way to handle these special
Strong's while still being able to use them for dictionaries with
the standard keys. This is how:</p>
<p>1) When looking up an entry in a dictionary, first try to use the
"raw key" (like G5179b)</p>
<p>2) If the dictionary does not have that key, try with a
"normalized key" (in this case G5179)</p>
<p>This way the special Strong's from NASB for example can still be
used to lookup "normalized entries" from other Strong's keyed
dictionaries.<br>
</p>
<p>This is how my dictionary info box looks like now: <a href="https://pasteboard.co/JibMDcW.png">https://pasteboard.co/JibMDcW.png</a></p>
<p>Best regards,<br>
Tobias<br>
</p>
</blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>