<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 06/01/2018 à 20:13, Troy A.
Griffitts a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1796eec6-f4bc-a71c-ae26-80f4d5e89a31@crosswire.org">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<p>These v11ns are not in the sources because we are still
researching. But since these have been double checked to
printed editions,</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
I have the printing edition!! And this report is about the printing
edition, not about the doc file. But the doc file correspond exactly
to the printing edition.<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1796eec6-f4bc-a71c-ae26-80f4d5e89a31@crosswire.org">
<p> I highly doubt whatever 'errors' you see are actually errors
in the v11n, but rather a bad source text. I am sorry for
speculating, but I know these v11ns were checked and verified by
a second individual against a printed edition and also know
there is a ton of low quality texts online which claim to be
things which they are not. <br>
</p>
</blockquote>
The check was not good done. <br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1796eec6-f4bc-a71c-ae26-80f4d5e89a31@crosswire.org">
<p> These are simply my suspicions without having the time now to
put in the research. I hope you find a way to check and
confirm.</p>
</blockquote>
Then I can confirm this :<br>
The current canon_LXX.h and the LXX,rahlfs.h don't match with the
printing edition, I have with me.<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1796eec6-f4bc-a71c-ae26-80f4d5e89a31@crosswire.org">
<p>Troy</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/06/2018 12:06 PM, Cyrille
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:d574636c-c4d5-100e-34a6-ca6b14d5fbc2@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 06/01/2018 à 18:36, Troy A.
Griffitts a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:204237e4-ac68-df7b-0029-653f603ba43f@crosswire.org">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
<p>Dear Cyrille,</p>
<p>I just did a brief diff between the canon_lxx.h and the
canon_lxx-super.h I sent you in my previous email, and the
differences don't look like anything useful. I must be
mistaken about what this file is. Have a read of the
comments in the file I send and those in the canon_lxx.h
included in 1.8.0. They are very similar, but the *-super.h
v11n includes this comment near the end of the header:</p>
<p>"This is not intended for critical editions that separately
encode variant traditions of Joshua, Judges, Tobit, etc.
that are already served by the Rahlfs versification system
(q.v.)."</p>
<p>I am not sure to what the "Rahlfs versification system
(q.v.)" refers, nor the /quod vide/ at the end of the
reference.</p>
<p>I could possibly refer to the analysis of Rahlfs in the LXX
v11n folder I send to you earlier, specifically here, but I
am not sure:</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/canon_rahlfs.h"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/canon_rahlfs.h</a></p>
</blockquote>
My question is why this v11n are not in the sources? And I
compare the Rahlfs.h, it's not good... still a lot of issues. I
ready to perform it. Please let me know the good way to help. <br>
But it clear for me that for the current source I have, it's not
possible to use the current LXX v11n.<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:204237e4-ac68-df7b-0029-653f603ba43f@crosswire.org">
<p>But I do not see any accommodation for alternate traditions
in there. I may need to go search old emails to dig up the
discussions on this.</p>
<p>Troy<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/06/2018 09:36 AM, Cyrille
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2fe6b2d8-bfb9-2b88-30c2-67a756b8aa21@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 06/01/2018 à 17:16, Troy A.
Griffitts a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0F41A14C-6286-44A1-8737-B89B414C849F@crosswire.org">Hi
Cyrille,<br>
<br>
Just a few comments which I hope will clear up a few
things.<br>
<br>
The sword-tools SVN repo needs to be checked out to your
computer before you can run the convert.sh for CCAT. The
repo contains the .jar file you asked about. You cannot
just download the individual convert.sh script.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Ok It's clear. I need to clone it with hg? The user is this
from the automatic email send? If it is this email I can't
find it again <span class="moz-smiley-s7"><span>:-\</span></span><br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0F41A14C-6286-44A1-8737-B89B414C849F@crosswire.org">
<br>
SWORD versifications are often a superset for multiple
Bibles. The SWORD engine provides a facility for frontends
to easily skip empty entries. Thus, when you discover that
a chapter here or a chapter there has too many verses, it
is probably that way to support another Bible which has
more verses for that chapter.<br>
<br>
LXX v11n has been researched extensively by Chris and
others. There are many issues regarding the LXX which are
not easily resolved, e.g., Rahlfs providing two textual
traditions of the same book in parallel with different
versifications. I h research for LXX in general can be
found here:<br>
<br>
<a
href="http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
OK but what to do?? Is it possible to use the Rahlfs with
osis2mod? Because Rahlfs is not the current one. I have the
Rahlfs text. If I use the current LXX v11n with my text I
will have really a lot of issues!<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0F41A14C-6286-44A1-8737-B89B414C849F@crosswire.org">
<br>
Hope this helps a bit.<br>
<br>
Troy<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On January 6, 2018 9:01:01 AM
MST, Cyrille <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:lafricain79@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true"><lafricain79@gmail.com></a>
wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt
0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Hello,
Before to work on a new module for the LXX, I decided to verify the
current LXX v11n. And what was my surprise discovering many errors!
Please can you give me the list of the current modules using LXX v11n?
I will propose a new with correction, some books give me worries, like
Esther, which contains a versification in letter, I will make you a
proposal once my verification is finished. I work with the A. Rahlfs
(maybe the current LXX v11n was made with an other ?)
Best regards, Br Cyrille
<hr>
sword-devel mailing list: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org" moz-do-not-send="true">sword-devel@crosswire.org</a>
<a href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel</a>
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse
my brevity. </blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>