<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Костя Маслюк <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kostyamaslyuk@gmail.com" target="_blank">kostyamaslyuk@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">What about the "inconsequent lexicon index" fix i have posted here a month ago? I realize that it would not be threated as Critical, but it is still bad behaivior that affects every Sword frontend.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I also realize that fix would not be complete, but no one even asked me for deeper investigation, if people have no time.<br></p></blockquote><div>I have only limited permissions to commit into the trunk - the swig bindings that I maintain and my CMake files that I maintain are the only areas I have commit privileges on trunk because those are the only areas I am actively familiar with. Any other changes I've made (e.g. SFTP support, HTTPS support) I had to go through the same process of submitting a patch and waiting for feedback. This is because I spend very little time in the C++ internals of the engine, so those more familiar with it serve as gatekeepers to ensure the work I do is of acceptable quality.</div>
<div><br></div><div>At Troy's request, I am only merging from trunk over to the sword-1-7-x branch, so that all patches are also in trunk for the next minor release and also so he or Chris or DM or the other people in charge of the specific areas continue to be the gatekeepers for their areas of expertise. Nothing will be committed to the sword-1-7-x branch directly, only merged down from trunk when possible.</div>
<div><br></div><div>There are very few people familiar with the internals of the engine (Troy and Chris) or the utilities (Troy, Chris, and DM), so sometimes responses can be slow, especially over the holidays.</div><div>
<br></div><div>--Greg</div></div></div></div>