<div dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr">
05.06.2013 5:32 пользователь "Nic Carter" <<a href="mailto:niccarter@mac.com" target="_blank">niccarter@mac.com</a>> написал:<br>
> I guess we need to have some sort of implementation with which to try this out with. I remember that trying to create a cLucene search index on my old iPhone 3G was sufficiently silly that I removed that functionality in PS. But I needed to test it to confirm that it was a stupid idea to allow users to attempt it. (I would say the same for BibleTime mini & say that 2.5hrs is way too long to even suggest a user plug in their phone and run it overnight! But that's just my sanity shining through, and I'll resume my insanity in a moment)...<br>
></p>
<p dir="ltr">This statement forced me to check: with BtMini i got nine minutes to create clucene search index for KJV (iphone 3gs 6.1 firmware). Can't believe that 3g to 3gs performance difference can be up to 16 times.</p>
<p dir="ltr"><br></p><p dir="ltr">Coming back to conversation subject, there can be i didn't noticed too, whether idea with module-supplied-v11n was rejected? Compared to Scope feature it is more powerful flexible, do not increase load on frontend, and finally simple to realize. I even consider ability to provide several v11n schemes for one module, whether it is necessary for user to turn off deuterocanonical content.</p>
<p>Blessings<br></p></div>