<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On 13/02/2013, at 2:20 AM, Chris Burrell <<a href="mailto:christopher@burrell.me.uk">christopher@burrell.me.uk</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; ">Any personal commentary feature that we would use from Sword/JSword would have to allow for concurrent users and different users. I'm not sure where we're at on that side of things in terms of the current Sword/JSword offering.</div></blockquote></div><br><div>This is an important consideration and may be beyond the scope of what those with the technical know-how of SWORD innards are prepared to do? But I would love to see something like this, so that each front-end doesn't need to implement it from scratch for themselves? But, what happens if the different parts of a SWORD module are out of sync with each other, cause the entire module is being re-sync'd from the cloud?</div><div>For this reason, do we need to invent a new module format for something that will work over the cloud?</div></body></html>