<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Trevor Jenkins <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:trevor.jenkins@suneidesis.com">trevor.jenkins@suneidesis.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Jonathan Morgan <<a href="mailto:jonmmorgan@gmail.com">jonmmorgan@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Other sources of cross-references:<br>
</div>> The TSK has a fairly rich and detailed set of cross-references, ...<br>
<br>
Hardly the most rigorous academic source.<br></blockquote><div><br>True indeed, but to be honest I don't care a whole lot about having a rigorous academic source. To me the advantages of the TSK are:<br>1. Available right now in a form I use.<br>
2. It is useful. A lot of the cross-references are very good.<br><br>It's not perfect, but I am not aware of anything that better meets these two criteria for me.<br><br>Jon<br></div></div>