<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Thanks Zhaojun I will update gsword from your update.<br>Since we are talking about the Chinese Bible, people are complaining the extra space between Chinese words (There is no need for space between Chinese word, English does), do you have a solution for that problem?<br><br>Thanks<br>Yiguang<br><br>--- On <b>Wed, 8/26/09, 清教徒 <i><lzj369@gmail.com></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: 清教徒 <lzj369@gmail.com><br>Subject: Re: [sword-devel] sword-devel Digest, Vol 65, Issue 32 Simplified Chinese text problem<br>To: yighu@yahoo.com, "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" <sword-devel@crosswire.org><br>Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 11:52 AM<br><br><div id="yiv515780050">I have fixed the wrong characters. You can download it from
Kokkos website.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Yiguang Hu <span dir="ltr"><<a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:yighu@yahoo.com" target="_blank" href="/mc/compose?to=yighu@yahoo.com">yighu@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-size-adjust: inherit; font-stretch: inherit;" valign="top">
Regarding the simplified Chinese union version wording problem, I suspect it was caused by the software that was used to convert Traditional Chinese into Simplified Chinese using automated conversion. The word "have有" in Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese should be the same. But it seems the conversion software took the traditional word "have有" and converted to a word which is very close to word "有冇" except that it missed two "-" in the middle of that word. Many people(Even people from China) would read that strange looking word "冇"as "have有" without problem not realizing it means "none<span>无</span>" actually. We don't use that word in mainland China much. There is a commonly recogzined Chinese Word "none<span>无</span>" which is very different from the above variotion of "have有" to
"冇".<br><br>The solution is to replace that word globaled and rebuild sword module and redeploy it and should not cause problem. I mean in the text the word "冇" actually means "有". Any place that means "None <span>无" should have used word "</span><span>无" instead of </span>"冇".<br>
<br>I would love to help fix it since I am struggling with that problem on my gsword site. But I don't have the original source file. I have my version of that file on my other site at ccim and I could try to generate the sword module with that. But I would love either original contributor of the module to correct the problem or give me the original file and I correct it or compare with the version I have. My version of the text does not have this problem.<br>
<br>Yiguang<br><br>> Can someone volunteer to see how bad the problem is? And if<br>> it can be <br>> readily fixed?<br>> <br>> Here are the
reports:<br>> <br>> hello,<br>> <br>> There is a serious mistake in the Chinese Bible text the<br>> ChiUns module.<br>> Every "has" is "hasn't" and every "is" is "isn't".<br>
> <br>> for example Genesis chapter 1 verse 3<br>> ? ? : ? ? ? , ? ? ? ? ?<br>> It means "God said, Let there isn't light: and there wasn't<br>> light.<br>> The "?(is not)" should be "?(is)".<br>
> <br>> I hope you can correct it.<br>> <br>> God bless<br>> <br>> <br>> Also:<br>> <br>> Hi there,<br>> <br>> --Sorry,my english is not very well.--<br>> <br>> in Bible Texts-*ChiUns(* Chinese Union Version<br>
> Simplified )( Language: zh download here:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.crosswire.org/sword/modules/ModDisp.jsp?modType=Bibles">http://www.crosswire.org/sword/modules/ModDisp.jsp?modType=Bibles</a>)<br>> Script:all chinese word:*?*(means have),has been<br>
> displayed:*?*(means none,doesn't have).<br>> <br>> thank you for your attention .<br>> <br>> Emmanuel !<br>>
<br>> In Christ's Service,<br>> DM Smith<br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20090826/7ca89ef6/attachment.html">http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20090826/7ca89ef6/attachment.html</a>><br>
> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> sword-devel mailing list<br>> <a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org" target="_blank" href="/mc/compose?to=sword-devel@crosswire.org">sword-devel@crosswire.org</a><br>
> <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel</a><br>> <br>> <br>> End of sword-devel Digest, Vol 65, Issue 32<br>> *******************************************<br>
> </td></tr></tbody></table><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
sword-devel mailing list: <a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org" target="_blank" href="/mc/compose?to=sword-devel@crosswire.org">sword-devel@crosswire.org</a><br>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel</a><br>
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page<br></blockquote></div><br>
</div></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>