<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:vxk63smfyyh.fsf@mesquite.kleinpaste.org"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Shouldn't the fixed modules be uploaded again.
This solution is not suitable to the end user IMO.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
No, of course not. The modules should be fixed at Crosswire and re-issued</pre>
</blockquote>
Karl,<br>
<br>
I guess I'm missing something ... what's the difference? Doesn't "fixed
at Crosswire and re-issued" simply mean that we submit an updated/fixed
module to go on the website? I thought that was what Manfred was
suggesting. I'm not trying to be argumentative, but I honestly don't
see the distinction that you bring up.<br>
<br>
Brian<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>