<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Can't a random person submit a module update for Crosswire? Crosswire
(Chris I think) could choose to use the updated version or to ignore
it, but unless there is a downside, I don't see why they wouldn't use
the update ... at least put it in Beta.<br>
<br>
<br>
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:vxktzg6eij4.fsf@mesquite.kleinpaste.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">"Brian J. Dumont" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bdumont@ameritech.net"><bdumont@ameritech.net></a> writes:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">what's the difference? Doesn't "fixed
at Crosswire and re-issued" simply mean that we submit an updated/fixed
module to go on the website?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
My understanding is that these modules are maintained at Crosswire, not
uploaded by random folks.
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org">sword-devel@crosswire.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel</a>
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>