<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.18.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Wow, this is great. This guy isn't wrong for anything he does. "Yes, I did refer to you as a mass murderer of millions, but only regarding a specific point of argument." <BR>
<BR>
And for the second, saying someone has a mental problem is acceptable when they don't agree with you. No, such things are definitely not insults.<BR>
<BR>
Being condescending isn't helping your point. You flamed me in your first response about the scripts. Saying I am hot under the collar as a response is rather ridiculous. Getting my way about what? What is my way? It seems nothing you do is wrong, as long as you can justify it with some convoluted example.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 16:16 -0700, Chris Little wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
John H. wrote:
> Chris, this is interesting coming from you, the same person who referred
> to me as both "hitler" and I just found out while I wasn't even in the
> channel on irc that you said I had mental problem. I think you're not
> in any place to say what is and is not christian. Yet you accuse me of
> name calling?
The Hitler reference was an attempt to invoke the corollary of Godwin's
Law that says the argument is over--because I was tired of your arguing
even hours ago when you were on IRC. It wasn't an insult. I explained it
at the time. I guess you chose to ignore that little fact.
And my saying that I suspected you might have a mental problem wasn't
meant as an insult. It's a sincere suspicion I have because it seems
like the most logical explanation for this irrational behavior. I don't
know whether you're just terrifically hot under the collar because you
aren't getting your way--but you're behaving quite, quite irrationally.
> <A HREF="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html">http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html</A>
> <A HREF="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/usc_sec_17_00000106----000-.html">http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/usc_sec_17_00000106----000-.html</A>
>
> you need to actually read something instead of just citing it. Please
> point me to the specific word or words proscribing what you are
> referring to, or defining it in the way you said it is defined.
Those sections are about a paragraph long. Don't be stubborn. Just read
them. They're short.
--Chris
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: <A HREF="mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org">sword-devel@crosswire.org</A>
<A HREF="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel</A>
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>