<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Jonathon Blake wrote:
<blockquote
cite="midc4797ebf0603071835p532cb250ncb86159e007be265@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 3/5/06, Kahunapule Michael Johnson <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:kahunapule@mpj.cx"><kahunapule@mpj.cx></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The future is hard to predict. Currently, OSIS (or rather a subset of OSIS) is used by The Sword Project as one option for Scripture text import.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
There also is a utility program that converts OSIS input to e-Sword,
or Pocket e-Sword modules.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Cool. Where might I get a copy of that utility?<br>
<blockquote
cite="midc4797ebf0603071835p532cb250ncb86159e007be265@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> I think STEP may be in wider use than OSIS, but STEP seems to have a lack of a steering committee at the moment, and
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Did you really mean STEP? _Nobody_ is creating modules using STEP.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Yes. That was actually my point. :-) I was encouraging a more
historical perspective of how standards rise and fall.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>