[sword-devel] Script to find a best fit v11n
Arnaud Vié
unas.zole+avie at gmail.com
Mon Jun 30 09:31:24 EDT 2025
It might be a silly question, but can't we just consider changing the
libsword license to something more permissive to allow such use cases,
without overthinking about GPL compatibility issues ?
It is quite uncommon for open source libraries to use GPL nowadays, as it's
very restrictive by nature. GPL remains mostly for "complete" applications
- libraries tend to rather use LGPL, Apache 2.0 or MIT license (depending
on the level of protection they seek), to favour wide usability.
It is to be noted that JSword is published under LGPL, which allows other
apps to use it without constraints as long as it's not being modified.
It would be enough for the current use case, and it would make sense for
libsword and jsword to be aligned.
Personally speaking, I'd favour something more permissive like the Apache
2.0 license, which basically allows any usage or modification of any kind,
but requires people to preserve the initial copyright notice and notify of
significant changes.
Of course, publishing under a new license can only be done by the current
rights holder, which according to the libsword LICENSE is the "CrossWire
Bible Society", as an organisation.
Does Troy have the full power of decision on the topic ?
Troy, what do you think of publishing libsword under a more permissive
license ?
Regards,
Arnaud
Le lun. 30 juin 2025 à 14:43, Matěj Cepl <mcepl at cepl.eu> a écrit :
> On Mon Jun 30, 2025 at 4:55 AM CEST, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> > From what I understand as someone who isn't a lawyer but has done
> > licensing audits for applications in Ubuntu and Debian, you'll only
> > run into issues if you publish *built binaries* of your code.
>
> That technically may be true, but it is a stupid idea. You don’t
> do open source software, which nobody can package and distribute.
>
> And apparently FSF doesn’t agree with my analysis:
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#v2v3Compatibility
>
> So, my only advice is to relicense your new program under GPLv2
> and send FSF to … Apparently, you will be in the distinguished
> company of Linus Torvalds and many others.
>
> Best,
>
> Matěj
>
> --
> http://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, @mcepl at en.osm.town
> GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8
>
> For those of you who think we are descendents from those cavemen
> who stood and fought with dinosaurs, you must be nuts, we are
> descendents from the ones who ran like hell to live.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20250630/c84d236e/attachment.htm>
More information about the sword-devel
mailing list