[sword-devel] Not user-friendly behavior in commentaries (should be continuous)

[David Haslam]

Is anyone in this thread confusing osisID syntax and osisRef syntax ?

Just a thought....

David

Sent from ProtonMail Mobile

On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 15:11, Fr Cyrille <fr.cyrille at tiberiade.be> wrote:

> Le 01/06/2020 à 15:14, yvand a écrit :
>
>> Le 01/06/2020 à 13:20, Fr Cyrille a écrit :
>>
>>> Le 01/06/2020 à 11:16, yvand a écrit :
>>>
>>>> If I change all the OSIS references to match every verses, I hope the
>>>> module size will not grow 20 times. And if I do so, for frontends like
>>>> Xiphos which have a "commentary by chapter" view, the frontend will
>>>> duplicate the commentary or use a hack to avoid duplication of the
>>>> same text…
>>>
>>> You have not to duplicate the text, Only to change the ref, ex
>>> Ps.1.1-Ps.1.6 and the text for the Psalm 1 will be shown for all the
>>> verses of the Psalm.
>>
>> It is not the case. I tested FreCJE in Xiphos, BibleTime and Andbible again with default settings. None of these frontends show the commentary if you are at Genesis 1 verse 2. Although the first OSIS reference of the first commentary is Gen.1.1-Gen.1.19
>
> Very strange, I don't have the same behavior. I use a personal commentary (copyrighted), I converted it in USFM and if I have a comentary for multiple verse I use : \v 1-6 by instance, then with u2o.py it's well converted and displayed as well in xiphos.
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sword-devel mailing list:
>> sword-devel at crosswire.org
>>
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20200601/a08178c8/attachment-0001.html>