[sword-devel] Behavior of SWModule::getConfigEntry in case of multiple entries with same key

Troy A. Griffitts scribe at crosswire.org
Sun May 5 08:31:10 MST 2019


Hi Tobias,

Yeah, so in my frontends, I usually just have a toolbar or option menu
which has associated buttons or menu checkbox toggles for any options
available in the installed module set, which can be obtained, along with
suggested option names, tooltips, options value (if more than simply On
and Off are available) with the code Peter sent.

I know at least Bibletime, at one point and probably still, lists the
options per modules.

My usecase is typically: I want to toggle Strongs and Morphology for a
second while I do a word study; I want to turn footnotes on or off,
etc.  I typically don't care if it is done for one particular module.  I
just want them either on or off.

But, I understand others have different study habits and that is why we
have different user interfaces.

So, having said all this... SWModule::optionFilters will give you a
list<OptionFilter *> for any module.  The problem right now is that this
property is protected.  You would need to expose this in a derived class
and override SWMgr::createModule to construct your derived class instead
of the ones created in the default implementation.  That would suck and
isn't the path I would want you to go down.

So, I can add a public getOptionsFilters() method for you to access
this, if you really wish to know exactly which option filters are
available on a per module basis.  That's simple and would help other who
wish to show per module options.

There is one caveat though, the default implementation of
SWMgr::addGlobalOptionFilters only constructs one instance of each type
of filter and reuses it for all modules which want that same filter. 
This is how, e.g., toggling Strongs numbers toggles it for all modules. 
If you indeed wish to allow toggling of an option for a single module,
but not others, then you'd want to override
SWMgr::addGlobalOptionFilters and make it work more like
SWMgr::addLocalOptionFilters, which constructs an instance of the filter
for each module, and thus would allow you to toggle one option for a
module and not affect that same logical option class for any other module.

Hope this is helpful,

Troy


On 5/5/19 7:56 AM, Tobias Klein wrote:
>
> Hi Troy, Peter,
>
> Thank you! My usecase is to list the options available for one
> particular (bible translation) module.
>
> @Troy: The solution you suggested is probably what I need. Or are
> there better solutions based on my usecase mentioned above?
>
> Best regards,
> Tobias
>
> On 05.05.19 15:41, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>> While Peter is correct about how to find all the options that any
>> loaded module might allow for toggling by an end user... and if this
>> is your purpose, you should certainly use the methods Peter
>> suggested... your question as to more generally how to read config
>> entries which have the same key values is answered by how to iterate
>> a multimap in C++. SWModule::getConfig returns the full multimap of
>> config entries. Something like this should work:Hi
>>
>> ConfigEntMap::const_iterator begin =
>> module->getConfig().lower_bound("Key");
>> ConfigEntMap::const_iterator end =
>> module->getConfig().upper_bound("Key");
>>
>> for(; begin !=end; ++begin) {
>> cout << begin->first.c_str() << " = " << begin->second.c_str() << endl;
>> }
>>
>> But I've never needed to do this as a client of the library. Maybe if
>> you tell us your use case, we can recommend a facility in the system
>> which might make things easier for you.
>>
>> Troy
>>
>> On May 5, 2019 2:04:11 AM MST, Peter von Kaehne <refdoc at gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>>     On Sun, 2019-05-05 at 08:49 +0200, Tobias Klein wrote:
>>
>>         Hi, how is SWModule::getConfigEntry(const char *key) supposed
>>         to behave when there are multiple entries with the same key? 
>>
>>
>>     There is a set of separate methods for those.
>>
>>     Check out ./examples/cmdline/listoptions.cpp
>>
>>         { SWMgr library; StringList options =
>>         library.getGlobalOptions(); for (StringList::const_iterator
>>         it = options.begin(); it != options.end(); ++it) { cout <<
>>         *it << " (" << library.getGlobalOptionTip(*it) << ")\n";
>>         StringList optionValues = library.getGlobalOptionValues(*it);
>>         for (StringList::const_iterator it2 = optionValues.begin();
>>         it2 != optionValues.end(); ++it2) { cout << "\t" << *it2 <<
>>         "\n"; } } 
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>>     http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>>     Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20190505/3965c8d1/attachment.html>


More information about the sword-devel mailing list