[sword-devel] PocketSword and non-Lucene search?
David Haslam
dfhmch at googlemail.com
Fri Apr 28 11:49:50 MST 2017
Is PocketSword unique among SWORD based front-ends in being the only one
where all searches must use the Lucene search index? I think so.
i.e. You cannot perform a non-Lucene search with PocketSword.
With my observations about Coptic to the fore, this essentially means that
you cannot use PocketSword to search modules that have a non-Roman script
such as Coptic.
If it was due to which Unicode version Lucene supports, there may be other
scripts such as *Ethiopic Extended* (added under 4.1) that present the same
symptoms.
That's a strong added reason for the PocketSword developers to facilitate a
non-indexed search method, at least as a user option.
Nic's already thinking about this, in view of the greater processing power
of more recent Apple iOS based devices.
Best regards,
David
--
View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/PocketSword-and-non-Lucene-search-tp4657130.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the sword-devel
mailing list