[sword-devel] Contributing to sword-tools repo?
Jaak Ristioja
jaak at ristioja.ee
Thu Jan 14 08:52:11 MST 2016
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
I totally agree with Matěj and I'm all for the git move, even to the
point of suggesting to create competing Sword++ fork in case of
further objections by Crosswire. I'd be happy to contribute to the C++
code.
God bless!
Jaak Ristioja
On 14.01.2016 17:06, Greg Hellings wrote:
> Based on the way this conversation has gone in the past, nearly
> everyone involved except the project administrator would welcome a
> migration to git. Even if it was a self-hosted git. But the
> project admin remained unconvinced the last time the topic came
> up.
>
> So please, don't re-open this old sore spot. Sword is in SVN,
> hosted on the crosswire server, and there it shall remain.
>
> --Greg
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Matěj Cepl <mcepl at cepl.eu> wrote:
>> On 2016-01-14, 12:50 GMT, Baiju M wrote:
>>> I know that this project is encouraging new contributors. I can
>>> read like this here: http://crosswire.org/volunteers/
>>> "Currently, the CrossWire Bible Society has a number of
>>> projects in progress, all open to new volunteers" I think
>>> moving to Git would be a good choice.
>>
>> I think you misunderstood the situation. There were numerous
>> flamewars on the topic of svn/git migration (browse through
>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.literature.sword.devel to see
>> for yourself), and I think the sitaution is a bit more
>> complicated than what this page suggests. The powers to be IMHO
>> actually really do not want new contributors to sword, because
>> they would have to loose some control over the project. You may
>> be allowed to contribute a simple bug fix, but the current state
>> of the sword codebase is good enough for them and there is really
>> little if any will to change status quo. And SVN serves as a
>> pretty good barrier for entry of new contributors, so it will
>> stay here for a long long time.
>>
>>> I started collecting few notes here, when we are going for
>>> migration, this will be helpful.
>>> http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Git_Migration
>>
>> See
>> https://gitlab.com/mcepl/git-svn-tools/blob/master/git-svn-fix-author
s
>>
>>
and git-svn-fix-tags in the same repo. The result is
>> https://gitlab.com/mcepl/sword-tools
>>
>> HOwever, as I said, the block for the transition is in people not
>> in tools.
>>
>> Blessings,
>>
>> Matěj
>>
>> -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mcepl at ceplovi.cz GPG
>> Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
>>
>> [...] sleep is no substitute for caffeine. -- Robert Storey in
>> review of Debian (when describing re-compilation of kernel :-)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ sword-devel
>> mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
> _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing
> list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions
> to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=Iqle
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the sword-devel
mailing list