[sword-devel] Namespace Proposal re eBible - collissions, duplication, clean-up etc

[Greg Hellings]

The former - installing from each repository into a different folder.
Does it require changes to front-ends? Yes, unless we push that
behavior into the default construction of an SWMgr. Does that mean we
should discount it in its entirety? I don't believe so.

The path to it is not the simplest, but I do believe it leaves us in a
desirable position.

--Greg

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Peter von Kaehne <refdoc at gmx.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 08:54 -0500, Greg Hellings wrote:
>> This is a proposal I've brought up multiple times in the past ...
>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:08 AM, DM Smith <dmsmith at crosswire.org>
>> wrote:
>> > If we had each repository downloaded to its own folder,
>> >
>> > > On Sep 3, 2015, at 5:26 AM, Peter von Kaehne <refdoc at gmx.net>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > Proposal:
>> > >
>> > > 1) Add a namespace element to ModuleName and datapath. In
>
> Greg, just for clarity - which of the two proposals are you endorsing?
>
> Former, which DM discounts himself would require changes in the
> software, latter would make changes interesting and compelling in terms
> of Abbreviation support, but not necessitate anything.
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page