[sword-devel] how dead are the apps?
karl at kleinpaste.org
Wed Mar 11 12:11:17 MST 2015
Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
> This gives a decent overview of ongoing activity.
Phooey. Its "decent overview" thinks Xiphos came into existence in 2009
and is written in Scheme, and I can't find a way to look at the other 5
of its 6 reviews. I am unconvinced I can trust anything else it says,
> Bible Desktop is very much alive on that criteria alone. Many, many
> downloads every month.
Likewise Xiphos. Thousands of downloads, and that's just the source
tarball and Win32 installer; there is no way to track RPM installs, but
given that Fedora users get it automatically and Win32 users have to
look for it manually, I presume that RPM installs are substantially
higher than Win32.
> It's not that I don't want active development. Sure, adding new
> features is great. But just because an app hasn't been released in
> ages doesn't mean it should be removed from our app list.
Yes, but you're one of the reasons I asked. "It seems Xiphos is the
only actively developed SWORD frontend these days" in #xiphos on 14
Jan. Similar things were muttered at me a couple days ago, hence my
I'm not looking to get anything knocked off any list. That said, it
would be nice if folks would update the Choosing page
<http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Choosing_a_SWORD_program> once in several
blue moons. There are many areas yet unfilled, and quite a number of
recently-created or -updated categories that have gone blank.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the sword-devel