[sword-devel] Xiphos 4.0.3

[Greg Hellings]

Matej,

Are you certain that you're calling up the xiphos that came from my
packages? My biblesync build script never generates a
biblesync.so.1.1.2 at all, so there should be no way for the Xiphos
package to be created while referencing it. If the biblesync spec file
was generating a library file with 1.1.2 at the end, I would get
errors during build of the biblesync packages saying that the extra
file wasn't packaged into the RPM.

--Greg

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Matěj Cepl <mcepl at cepl.eu> wrote:
> On 2015-08-17, 13:00 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
>> I can't offer any guess, being not involved in Redhat repo management.
>> My builds use a spec that started as mostly Greg's.  Your version lacks
>> Greg's -fPIC additions from several months ago (F22 got uptight about
>> security in some new, weird sense, and -fPIC became a requirement; I
>> understand RHEL/Centos/EPEL are behind this curve), and adds the
>> soversion nonsense.  Non-comment differences (-U0) between mine and that:
>
> Thanks, this helped. If you would be interested, see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254317 for more.
>
> Blessings,
>
> Matěj
>
> --
> http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mcepl at ceplovi.cz
> GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
>
> How many Bavarian Illuminati does it take to screw in a light
> bulb?
> Three: one to screw it in, and one to confuse the issue.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page