[sword-devel] Personal Commentary and Dropbox.

[Israel]

@ Nic Carter

I think leaving the sync open to the OPTION of letting other programmers 
plug in their favorite sync service would be nice. Hard coding Dropbox 
only service could prove to be a disaster if they flounder.  If you 
created a 'generic' way to interface with cloud syncing, then you could 
easily extend it to iCloud (if it became super popular) or Google's 
services, or Ubuntu or whatever...  Things on the internet change 
constantly and I think for longevity of your coding (basically making it 
easier for you later, or future devs) you should make it possible to 
plug in different services.

p.s. thanks for accepting my unlurking :)

On 02/13/2013 03:36 AM, David Instone-Brewer wrote:
> I love Dropbox but I agree that it doesn't give much in the way of APIs.
>
> I'm impressed by Google Apps Script which you can use to control their 
> spreadsheets and other Google docs.
> Google docs now work offline fairly well with Gears, though for 
> real-time syncs you need to be online of course.
> You can leave a script running on their servers at no cost.
> I've had a script running for a few months, which looks out for 
> attachments in a Gmail account and saves them as docs in Google Drive.
> It runs automatically every so-many minutes and very occasionally 
> misses a beat (due to server delays I think) but it hasn't fallen over.
> Have a peek at https://developers.google.com/apps-script/overview
>
> <https://developers.google.com/apps-script/overview>David IB
>
>
> At 07:51 13/02/2013, Chris Burrell wrote:
>
>> As soon as you use software to study rather than to read I think 
>> you're talking about more than 5 users.  A lot of my users will be 
>> Web based so syncing online could almost be expected as the same 
>> people will be using different computers
>> On 13 Feb 2013 02:41, "Nic Carter" <niccarter at mac.com 
>> <mailto:niccarter at mac.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     On 13/02/2013, at 3:50 AM, Israel <israeldahl at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:israeldahl at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     > Maybe you could create a way to plug in all the various cloud
>>     services.  Make it extensible.  It would be nice to have all the
>>     same modules across all the various sword programs on the various
>>     devices.  That may be a bit beyond the scope of what you were
>>     talking about.  But syncing all devices so that they can all
>>     share the same sword modules would be great! But, choice would
>>     help facilitate that.  For example I might have an iPhone with
>>     your program and an Ubuntu laptop with Xiphos and Bible Time and
>>     I want to be able to read the same Bible at home and on the train
>>     to work.  Dropbox (Ubuntu One, Evernote, etc...) would be a
>>     better choice for users using multiple platforms.
>>
>>     My thinking is that this sync would be for user-generated content
>>     only. Notes & bookmarks primarily?
>>     However, no need to limit it to that I guess?
>>
>>     But unless this way of plugging in "all the various cloud
>>     services" is done in the API, I think you'll find that it's way
>>     too much effort for each front-end to have to implement this.
>>     I know for me, features in PocketSword reflect things that I find
>>     useful and want for myself, along with bribery & threats... ;)
>>     Nah, basically, things that are going to be useful for lots of
>>     people rather than a very select few. Hence I'm thinking of
>>     Dropbox as it seems to be the best & most common sync platform.
>>     Apple, Google & Microsoft all have different/ulterior motivations
>>     for their sync platforms, Dropbox is simply trying to make money
>>     from sync, hence (as long as they don't go bust!) they're my
>>     choice...  ;)
>>
>>     Anyway, simple is good. Catering to a larger audience is good.
>>     Putting in a lot of effort for something that perhaps 5 users
>>     will ever use is not efficient use of my time. Something that is
>>     cross-platform is essential. (Dropbox supports iOS, Android, Ruby
>>     & Python, which possibly covers everyone? But seems to infer that
>>     Dropbox integration at the API level (C++ or Java) is probably
>>     not gonna happen?)
>>
>>     Thanks for all the thoughts so far (& unlurking!) :) I'm
>>     interested in more thoughts, too :)
>>
>>
>>     Thanks, ybic
>>             nic...  :)
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>>     <mailto:sword-devel at crosswire.org>
>>     http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>>     <http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel>
>>     Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel 
>> <http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel>
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page


-- 
Regards

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20130213/0e785593/attachment.html>