[sword-devel] USFM conformance in usfm2osis.py

[Kahunapule Michael Johnson]

On 08/02/2012 02:59 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 11:54 AM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
>> On 08/01/2012 09:17 PM, Chris Little wrote:
>>> End tags like \fqa* make little difference. Without the relaxed processing, the only difference my script makes is to not delete these end tags.
>>
>> Simply deleting \fqa* might not have the intended effect. For example,
>> \f + xxxx could also be translated \fqa yyyy \fqa*or \fqa zzzz\fqa*.\f*
>> does not mean the same thing as
>> \f + xxxx could also be translated \fqa yyyy or \fqa zzzz.\f*
>> but does mean the same thing as
>> \f + xxxx could also be translated \fqa yyyy \ft or \fqa zzzz\ft .\f*
>
> I delete end tags like \fqa* as a final step in my footnote processor,
> before which, all note-internal tags that begin \f- are treated
> identically and will cause the closure of the previous tag. So your
> first and third cases get treated identically, just as when a \fqa* precedes \ft in the third case.

Good. :-)
Thank you.