[sword-devel] Marking transChange within a <w> ?

DM Smith dmsmith at crosswire.org
Fri Nov 5 12:09:00 MST 2010


On 11/05/2010 02:48 PM, Chris Little wrote:
>
>
> On 11/5/10 11:35 AM, David Haslam wrote:
>
>> The example from Mt 21:31 illustrates one of the 17 instances.
>> <w lemma="strong:G3588 strong:G3962" morph="robinson:T-GSM 
>> robinson:N-GSM"
>> src="8 9">of<seg subType="x-added" type="x-transChange">his</seg>
>> father</w>?
>
> (Disclaimer: I don't know Greek, and I'm partly just guessing about 
> Greek grammar here.) I think this is just encoded incorrectly. 
> Arguably, we're hampered by some limitation of the engine, but I would 
> encode this as:
>
> <w lemma="strong:G3962" morph="robinson:N-GSM" src="8">of</w>
> <transChange type="added"><w lemma="strong:G3588" 
> morph="robinson:T-GSM" src="9">his</w></transChange>
> <w lemma="strong:G3962" morph="robinson:N-GSM" src="8">father</w>
Chris,

The problem with this is that in the KJV italics represents words that 
the translators felt that they had to add to the translation to reflect 
the proper meaning and for which there was no underlying Greek word.

That implies for the KJV <transChange type="added">xxx</transChange> 
should never wrap <w>...</w> with a lemma referring to the word that it 
translated ;)

-- DM

>
> If the other 16 instances are of a similar character, I think we could 
> just re-encode to correct the issue.
>
> --Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page




More information about the sword-devel mailing list