[sword-devel] Crossreferences
DM Smith
dmsmith at crosswire.org
Tue Aug 17 08:19:42 MST 2010
On 08/17/2010 10:30 AM, Mike Hart wrote:
> I'd really like this list of references as a commentary that can be
> watched next to the text, However, adding material into texts that are
> not present in the dead tree version is scary and deceptive to me. It
> will reduce the value of the texts maintained on Crosswire. If I'm
> following cross references in a Wyclif bible (circa 1380 in England),
> and find out that they aren't the original, but something from circa
> 1800 in Latvia, and added into Wyclif's work in 2010... I'd at least
> like to be able to know the reference is a revision and not original
> before I make public claims on the references. I'm just guessing, but
> I would think their is a fair number of crosswire users who are
> students and pastors who will publicize their work in some way
> and rely on the texts representing what they claim to represent.
>
I don't think you'll ever see a text at CrossWire modified to include
anything that is not in the upstream e-text. We try to find the most
faithful e-text for each of the modules. On occasion, we've pulled
modules because their upstream e-text has not been faithful to the
dead-tree version (e.g. BDB, if I remember correctly).
I think the basic idea is that the application should have a mode that
will provide the cross references from one module as companion to
another. I imagine that it will be something that the user will enable
deliberately. Hopefully, it will also be visually distinctive, such as
verse end markers using a different format or a parallel column.
> I do see the value in making some study aids available within texts,
> but they shouldn't replace the original texts, but rather be
> additional texts available (similar to the 3 different NET bibles, of
> which one has no aids, and one is fully filled). The one that is a
> Crosswire creation should be clearly marked as such to prevent
> misinterpretation.
>
> As an example: If you read the reasons behind the death of Tyndale,
> His crimes weren't the words chosen to represent the scripture, but
> the commentary added into the texts by his hand. If, as a bible
> student, I read that, and then go into the Tyndale new testament and
> find study aids present, I'd study it closely to see what the Church
> found so offensive. If the references are accurate, I can accurately
> study that subject, and will eventually find a note in Revelation
> 13 about the Pope that would explain a little anger on the part of the
> Church. However, If the references are revisionist, I'm going to form
> a completely innaccurate opinion of both Tyndale and the Church of his
> day.
>
> I'd recommend to every one on this list that the value of the various
> texts does not lie in adding Y2K views of study helps into the texts
> (red letters, x-references, addon tags about who was speaking when it
> isn't there), but in accurately representing what was put down on
> paper when the texts were created. If Wyclif didn't use red ink for
> Jesus words, I don't want to see Wyclif's bible displayed that way,
> it's just not helpful, and can be deceiving. I'm not about to go print
> out a whole Wyclif text and carry it around with me as my primary
> text, and I doubt anyone would. However, When I refer to it, and I do
> frequently, I want to see what 1380 saw the Bible as. The same goes
> for every text available in the Crosswire repository.
>
> --- On *Mon, 8/16/10, Jonathan Morgan /<jonmmorgan at gmail.com>/* wrote:
>
>
>
> As a generalisation, if all we are dealing with are a set of
> cross-references for a verse, what benefit is gained from making
> it part of an individual Bible rather than a commentary? Better
> display in frontends? Localised references? [I sometimes wonder
> whether we should be allowing that for all books anyway]
>
> Jon
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> <http://us.mc532.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sword-devel@crosswire.org>
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20100817/a43f67d4/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the sword-devel
mailing list